Not sure where you see the planchet crack. The coin is an Improperly mixed aloy. AKA "Woodie" The area on the rim and wheat stalk is a retained...
I have never had a post 82 cent degrade when in a controlled environment. It is everyday use that degrades the coins, cup holders, ground, etc.
Pretty medal, Ther coin is so busy, I think that it would be hard to grade from a photo. Also put it into a slab and sometimes it is nearly...
Your MM is not an RPM. The MM does not have the correct MM placement of any attributed. What you see is small die chips.
A lot of collectors don't like these blistered cents. And a majority think that they are gonna explode and have zinc rot in no time. It is simply...
The photos aren't good enough to show what the details look like. If you look at all the doubling on your coin, it all goes towards the rim. This...
Huh, I said 40 too. So, I will say that the surfaces are rougher than they look, and it got a 35.
Only struck at Philly? or is there an S mint also?
Not much brilliance to the Luster. 58 looks right.
I got told that scenario once, I called out a beautiful 79 CC/CC at a pawn shop, or was that 78? Anyways it was silver thicker and slightly...
One way to be sure that an error of this sort happened at this year in time, is to search the minting process of an 1802 coin. Just a thought?
Hong Kong 1951 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I don't see any doubling. Just a worn Nickel. You can check Brians Variety's https://www2.briansvarietycoins.com/listings
After 1989 there are no RPM's.
About 45 Deg.
Your right I missed that one.
Small strike thru on Lincolns High cheek bone. [ATTACH] Small strike thru at 10 oclock. I have found a few of these squirely marks. [ATTACH] Some...
I took some photos today of a couple 22D's. A few for small errors. But these are the only two I took both sides. First one just had an...
That depends on the luster. I think it has the eye appeal.
Cool circ find Larry!
Separate names with a comma.
