This is what the Redbook says about the 53D. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Thank you, those light pastels were definitely what got my attention. This year and date usually produced very dark and dull looking toning.
How many have read the Whitman standards? I will post them in the morning.
Hey, @Rick Stachowski
Honestly, This would need to be looked at in hand to see what type of doubling it is. At this point it is anyone's guess with the photos provided.
Those early morning photos just weren't a very good representation of the coin. I think that these are better. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The rays look completely normal. The peace dollar was known for being weakly struck. Also, you have damage in the area.
Here is another Franklin for you to guess the grade on the slab, and give your own opinion if you want. Please vote in the poll. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
James this is what you get when standards are no longer used. The game is market grading right now, with loosening and tightening of grades. PCGS...
@BlackberryPie Here is the reference that I use. http://www.lincolncentresource.com/1922Ddievarieties.html
I am on the fence. Take a look at the T in quarter, and the branch right above it. [IMG]
The doubling on the date is also a plating issue. This was a common problem on the early zinc cents.
Why would I sell it?
Just keep it Anecdotal
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
There isn't much luster coming from the images? Just wondering how we can help grade this album coin?
Heres a new pick up. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I am guessing 53. 50 obverse: The slight halos around the devices and light wear on the highpoints. Also, the curls at temple and cheek look a...
It's posted somewhere on CT. I would start a search for cheerios WAM cent.
I don't have the reference. But, there is a die marker on the Lapel that will confirm that your 2000 cent is a WAM.
Separate names with a comma.
