Here is the pop report as of today. [ATTACH]
Denver has the lowest population of 70's and highest population of 68 and under. The attached was taken 2/21. [ATTACH]
Another family member....
I went 66*. It is a beautiful example. Congrats!
A roll find from wayyyy back when I was a YN...Most everything else in my collection is a variety or die state... [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Well, I'm pretty sure I guessed high at this point...;)
If it doesn't have a reeded edge it's probably not a true racketeer nickel.
Time for a new avatar bro...
I really like the elevation chromatics on that one!:)
I think this die pair struck more coins than any other in the Morgan series. The old VAM-1 VNA-LDS4 maybe LDS5. Now re-classified as VAM-6B. One...
My guess is that it's a coin with images juiced to Saturday morning cartoons quality. Strong pass......
You sure it's not a Billy Beer? :rolleyes:
What about..... a secret mark from a secret designer on a St. Gaudens?:troll:
A very solid example for MS62. As is it's a nice piece of history. I have several MS 62 and MS63 examples of 22 and 23 P in old ANACS 6 digit...
That was the intent but I guess it didn't pan out at a full production mode.
https://coins.ha.com/itm/patterns/1885-1-snowden-dollar-judd-1747-pollock-1959-low-r6-pr64-ngc/a/1208-5821.s?ic16=ViewItem-BrowseTabs-Auction-Archi...
The 1885 Morgan Dollar JUDD 1747 was an attempt to come up with an anti-counterfeit feature.
Of all the up thread posts I consider none an anti-counterfeit secret mark.
I don't have an answer to this question. I don't know why they weren't less common either, I wasn't there... But my theory is they were checking...
How do you know that it wasn't intentional?
Separate names with a comma.
