Coins are either rotated CW or CCW, so there's no such thing as 387 degrees - it's either 17 degrees CW, or 17 degrees CCW. (think you were being...
US Mint tolerance is 27 degrees - Most services won't note a Rotated Reverse on the label unless it's 45 degrees or more -
You wanted 'positivity' 'or at least a nice comment' You didn't get either one, because the damaged coin didn't deserve a positive or nice...
Probably a lamination - An argument can be made that the scratch to the right could have been an attempt to lift the (at the time) retained...
If you mean those lines on either side of the torch, they're probably feeder finger scrapes, which is a very common occurrence on Quarters and...
Not a ''chunk' of reeding, but some force that pressed one quarter's edge into this coin, bending it.
What are we looking at, or looking for ?
I'm certainly not a circuit-board expert, but it looks like some type of tape to me. Put some acetone on a Q-tip, and it should come off immediately
Insider - 'reeding' hits don't affect the other side of the coin unless something caused it to bend from excessive pressure of the other coin's...
Damage from the reeding of another quarter that hit it in that area. Not a struck thru, imo.
could have also been cut down to be used as a dime in an older vending machine.
Damaged, imo, based on the 'lit' photos. Not a lamination issue or bad planchet, imo.
It's a genuine '69 Quarter on a Cent Planchet
Damaged
Save your money. It's not an experimental planchet, rinse, or anything 'different' from the Mint.
No photo showing
It's a nice example of a brockage strike.
? ? ?
If you're talking about the 'yellowish' stuff to the left of the I in IN - it's not an error, lamination, or anything that occurred at the Mint....
Above post nailed it!
Separate names with a comma.
