Don't look at the retail prices, look at recent auction prices. You seem to have done quite well on the 81-O. The only PCGS 64 CAC recently went...
[IMG]
Interesting piece. I'll assume the coin is genuine for the moment. The buyer isn't buying a 1795 dollar anymore, but rather a 1795 dollar made...
How about one of each? [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Congrats on finishing! It is a handsome G6.
Both ANACS and I would tell the submitter to submit the coin to Leroy Van Allen and accompany it with a description of why. If he chooses to...
I don't see where the clash has transferred lettering, which is required for a listing. That said, the clashing that is there can be used as a...
Looks like it went poof.
Which comes first, giving your coins names or carrying on conversations with them?
Can't really grade them from those pictures. No read on luster or surfaces. Generally not something I would have sent in. Good luck, and let us...
1875-S 20c piece.
I'm liking this answer. The coin was scratched by an implement or the mount when affixing or removing the mount.
Only small CC was used in 1878. Not an alteration, just a fake.
Crap. Right. Now I'm going to have to sit in the corner at the next TPG luncheon without any dessert, if I even get to go at all.
Yuck. Environmental damage in my book. Hard pass.
Fake with wrong reverse. It is worth nothing.
Grading is a continuum only in 4 dimensions -- strike, luster, surface preservation, and eye appeal. Surface preservation is additionally...
You have to take my Morgan Dollar class at the ANA Summer Seminar to learn it. :D
Nice coin! It looks AU58 to me. Do my white paper reflection test. Stand the coin (slab) on its edge on a while piece of paper, then look down...
AU55
Separate names with a comma.
