I think the use of stock photos is at best extremely lazy, and typically a sign of an unethical dealer. Perhaps if the dealer is selling cheap...
That is what they do. For a coin that is improperly cleaned, they give it a details holder, but for an improperly dipped coin where the luster is...
Coin was originally in and AU58 holder, was cracked out, and resubmitted and got an MS62. Surfaces are better than 62, NGC must have net graded...
Coin resided in NGC AU58 Holder, was cracked out, and resubmitted.
You have a dark but attractively toned SMS Jefferson. As @kSigSteve said, most black beauties look like environmental damage.
I don't know much about ANACS grading standards but when PCGS or NGC give an MS62 grade to a coin with surfaces that are obviously better than...
By Morgan Dollar standards, that is like a 3.0.
I'm sticking with my original grade. The luster looks better in the second (overexposed) photos but the hits look worse.
I dissent, the photos make the coin look like it is dipped and washed out, plus there is a hit smack dab in the center of the obverse. I say the...
But that is the whole point. That next grade represents the conditional rarity, and it is exactly that price jump that causes people to...
+1 This isn't directed at anyone in particular and certainly nobody in this thread, but I have seen some very vocal critics of CAC on different...
The only numismatic topic more volatile than CAC is Daniel Carr.
Hits it right out of the starting gate, very nice Justin.
Separate names with a comma.
