Either that or grease.
The date stands out as being fake to me. The 19 is larger than the 22 and the two twos look a little different. I wouldn't butva coin like this...
Definitely damaged as it's a cheap zinc Cent. Spend it.
Just do yourself a favor and pass. It's damaged and it will also be damaged.
Looks normal to me except for a buffing to make it shine so much.
I'd trust it until so have a reason not to but my suspicions would be up. When I see a claim like that I always ask myself, why?
It's a D with a worn die chip. The rest of the coin is also worn.
MD I'm sorry so say.
The lines must be unbroken. PCGS and NGC use different standards for the FBL designation. Yours is not FBL.
It's bullion and not a coin. Welcome to CT.
It's a woodie from an improper alloy mix not an annealing problem.
Counterstamps are Damage to the coin but there are a bunch of collectors of these items.
That's as real as it can be.
It all depends on the coin, the Die, Date, Variety and the Counterstamp itself. Some are common but some of those counterstamps are rare.
That crack sure looks like a deep scratch to me.
I said walk away but now I'm thinking you need to run.
Sounds and looks like you had another great day detecting.
You don't like the idea but the person that did it did like the idea.
Definitely walk away
Thanks, appreciate it.
Separate names with a comma.
