I like seeing full slab photos because it can give a better idea of what the coin looks like. When people juice photos, the label and holder can...
It looked like @Morgandude11 wanted to post some foreign toners. Then you can post next.
Also, I'm thinking we should include slab photos or at least mention the grade as that does play a role. Do others agree or is it better to hide...
@brg5658 what were the specs on the coin so I can add it to the summary properly?
Sounds like you're thinking of Back to the Future Part II :D
Considering the following go through, the Franklin isn't as bad and isn't in as focal of an area. [IMG] [IMG] [ATTACH] [IMG]
That is fair. I would have been extremely happy with an AU 58+ (those pluses sure are desired on 58s). To me AU 58 and MS 63/64 were the only...
I know a guy on Instagram that specializes in Peru coinage. He might be able to help. https://www.instagram.com/perucoins/?hl=en
That's very nice! It might be higher relative to world coins, but based on the Morgan scale, I'm going with a high end 4.
Prior threads: https://www.cointalk.com/threads/reguess-the-grade-1950-franklin.341480/...
And the answer is that ddddd is foolish! I figured this Franklin was a 63 or 64. I was wrong as PCGS called it UNC Details - Damaged...
@brg5658 you are up
Summary Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs...
Anyone else?
Reveal later tonight...
People manipulate photos all the time. There could be something wrong with just the reverse and a seller will take a picture in such a way to...
MS 64 PL
@Lehigh96 @kSigSteve @Mainebill @dwhiz @EyeAppealingCoins @johnmilton (just tagging some of the people from the prior guess thread)
Lovely! MS 66
MS 65 on the holder is my guess
Separate names with a comma.
