Again, worn die strike: http://www.error-ref.com/design-devouring-die-wear/
I agree with paddyman.
Unfortunately your coin suffers from PMD.
Unless we both need glasses, I’m not seeing an FG. I am seeing a worn die strike on both the obverse and reverse. It’s probably a filled die. Nice...
Yep...Flat and shelflike on a copper zinc cent. Die chip on the roof.
Yes, circulation and environmental damage.
Die deterioration doubling, DDD. http://doubleddie.com/144843.html
Looks like DDD. MD and DDD is common on Kennedy halves.
Congrats! It’s always fun to see someone find a new variety! Was it designated as the discovery coin?
Unfortunately it appears to be a worn die struck coin that became a worn coin. I don’t know of any DDOs for a 1937-D. JMHO
Hard to tell from partial pictures and the wear. Here is a link for 1937: http://varietyvista.com/03%20Buffalo%20Nickels/DDO%201937.htm
Unfortunately it appears you have a severe case of PMD. You might need to see a coin star about that;)
I understand what you are thinking. So consider this, the 1990-D cent mint mark. If: In 1990 and 1991 the Mint began applying the mint mark to...
There are a couple a marks on the tail of your 9, any curving is probably PMD. [ATTACH] This is a well known variety, if there would have been a...
All 1970-D are large date. Notice the tail of the 7 extends lower than the 0. 1970-S are the only known small dates.
I know. I’ve looked at a lot of nice FE’s and IHC’s but have yet to find a reasonable source. :(
It’s DDD, die deterioration doubling. http://doubleddie.com/144843.html
I think it’s a neat example but I think the price is a little high. $59
MD can happen on a few devices or just one, it depends on the movement between the coin in relation to the die. Here’s the listings for mint...
The reverse is MD. Flat, shelflike, with reduction in the devices. It’s hard to tell on the mint mark, it appears to be circulation wear instead...
Separate names with a comma.
