I am seeing some funky tones or maybe just diffucult to get a clear shot thru the slab. I don't really see any wear. or much for disturbed luster....
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Sorry for the terrible photos this is OMM-001, FS-511.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Gold id difficult from photos. I am at 64 maybe gem.
Coin B is the higher grade. IMO I m thinking coin A has had a slight cleaning/ old dip. Coin B just has a more original look.
What does the other side of the coin look like?
Well I guess we will see. That 10" of snow that fell thursday and friday, are almost melted. Maybe? What I won't do is deface and alter a coin...
The kiddo and I ate gonna go out this week, Hit a few places. Just waiting for the snow to melt.
Nice ones Messy, I especially like the 1831 O-109.
Any one every remember Vern? [MEDIA]
Welcome Shortcut, good to have ya.
See how the high points of the pillars are flush with the surfaces of this coin? Your slab photos show the opposite of this, meaning it is...
So tell us why every raised detail on a struck coin is sunken into the devices and field of this coin. You sir are looking at this backwards.
Plenty worth the reply. The reason this will only ever be a vise job, is because you are missing A small detail. But you are correct, the two...
In the event of a clash everything is wrong with the the way it lines up. This can only happen with a vise job. When are you gonna ask for help...
Take away a 65 vote. I went 64+
How long do we keep this thread alive, knowing that each of us can easily prove that this coin is a vice job?
Edit slow computer today.
Separate names with a comma.
