Not even close to a 2.
Nice hunting trip you had! Keep it up.
Not me! I think it's all blown out of the water for reasons I refuse to discuss.
Squeeze job so it's damaged.
The pics get a little fuzzy but it almost looks like there could be a little doubling on the IGWT. Since this is a 1972 and numerous doubling...
You need to watch the markets longer before acting. Welcome to CT. A post is a post so it won't take you long to sell on this forum.
I think it looks like a plating blister. The coin does appear to be a zinc Cent and this is the transition year.
Sorry but I don't do anything CNN.
Huge buying is occurring because of the recent dip in prices.
I looked, twice and I enlarged it. I'm not impressed as my imagination lets me see a D, larger than it should be about 4:00 o'clock, but my common...
All spenders! All 8 digits are required to be special in order to be a fancy number. Do a little research and you'll get the idea very quick.
Oh how funny!
A great example of a die chip as stated by others. I'd keepem all.
Not a Mint error, just poorly struck. Notice how the reverse is struck much better.
Like I said in your other thread, it's worth $20.00, maybe $21.00. No need for both threads.
In that condition, $20.00, maybe $21.00. It too damaged for a modern note.
It sounds like you have a coin that is environmentally damaged but only pictures of both sides will help us give you the facts.
No signs of a cleaning that I can see. That is one nice looking coin.
The W mintmark was distributed with other coins. Your chances of getting one, two or ten in a roll were about the same as getting none. Some...
Since it's clear I would think it's a spot of glue.
Separate names with a comma.
