The weak T in TRUST is from a grease or debris filled Die. Very common and worth face value. As for the reverse, it looks like a small spot of damage.
The obverse damage is a killer. I'm not seeing any Mint errors but if it was it's only worth face value with that damage.
Not a Mint error, just a really torn out Die, maybe even post Mint Damage. Welcome to CT.
We certainly hope not! :)
Bet you didn't expect that! :)
Lol I only attend yard sales. I never hold them.
You're welcome and I learned that a long time ago from my antique business. :) PS. That book is 72 years old so it's a nice collectible. In 2048,...
You have a few small die chips. Cuds must touch the rim and they look like this: [ATTACH]
All I want to know is how CoinWeek knows what I've found under my couch.
Highly damaged and only the person(s) that caused this would know. It's a spender. Welcome to CT.
Anytime you have more than one copy date the last date is the date the owner should go buy. Yours would be the second printing and 1943 is the first.
First off, it's none that you can see. All it takes is a very small hole, invisible to the eye, to have a hole large enough for air to get in to...
An old worn die so it's NAV.
Looks man made.
Looks like a parking lot find so go with Michaels response. Welcome to CT.
It gets blurry for me but it does appear to be MD. Wait for others to chime in.
Welcome to CT. It gets blurry when I blow it up but it does appear to be MD.
Thst is a nasty looking Cent, despite the overpolished die.
Very nice but I gotta tell ya, you've got the 1948 version. Wish we still had something like that today.
Here's another cud: [ATTACH] Your coin took a hit. You can see where the metal moved from and too and I can even see a little bit of zinc...
Separate names with a comma.
