depends on who you ask. PCGS will give them a numeric grade. I don't know about NGC. Opinions vary among collectors.
Looks genuine to me. Several obv chops which could easily lead to rim damage or flattening if the coin was on a hard surface when marked. To me,...
Wow, nen. That is a very, very rare coin. I would be humbled just to hold it~
I think from the photos, it would probably land in a details holder, due to what looks like cleaning (right obv field) and/or scratch (L obv...
That's a pathetic fake pcgs holder/label.
Wow! Great piece of history, Lee
Nice coin! my guess was 50.
MS 61?
looks very nice and clean so I guessed 67, no FS.
AU something, dipped to a degree of brightness that I don't find attractive .
4 different MM positions, this could be one, but might not, either. I would not consider buying it based on those photos. obv is scrubbed too.
Nice write up! Greene was a true genius, a master of the fighting retreat, who really bled out the British when his army was "defeated" at...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] This fake made me wary of small, "light" chopmarks, as in the right obv field. [ATTACH]
That's good to hear, shifts my opinion much farther in the "genuine" direction.
I can't say with any confidence that the ebay coin referenced in the OP is a fake. I do think that the small, lightly impressed chops in the L...
Looks good to me, just dirty
thanks for another good grading/learning experience.
I'm prone to undergrade, but this time I think 66; the tics look trivial and non distracting to me, and the coin appears to have great luster,...
It was posted on the CU forum by Bruce Morelan, who is very familiar with the high end trade dollars, that it was from the Eliasberg collection.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
