Definitely not.
Yep. Works for me. Nice one.
I doubt that it's a die break. More likely a die scratch.
AU maybe, but not -58.
It's a spot on the cent like all the others around it. It's just the location that got your attention. Worth 1¢.
The scratches across the bell lines at the left say "no way".
Business strike coins don't receive the same care at the Mint that proof coins do. The Mint has no intention of doing so. It's no surprise to me...
I see the first one as a slightly higher grade. Something like VF-35 vs. VF-30 or XF-40+ vs. XF-40. (Yeh, I know. There's no such thing as a "+"...
They look like they were cleaned.
I don't think Nic-a-date works on silver coins.
IMO the 1913T1 is an AU-55.
Take a look at the auction archives in Heritage. That's where you'll get a good idea of current values.
Yep, definitely older coins. I have very few 20th century coins. And mostly single coins for my type set after the 1850's. Exception is my FE/IHC set.
Thanks for doing the ID's. I'll do them also to check if I can do the correct ID. Sort of a sanity check on my capabilities.
I've got the Logan-McCloskey and the Durst books. I should take the time to ID the Die Varieties but I haven't -- yet.
Here's the early half dimes I got for my type set. 1795 Flowing Hair PCGS VF-25 [IMG] [IMG] 1797 Draped Bust Small Eagle Reverse 15 Stars PCGS...
All of my slabbed coins that I'm collecting by die marriage have the appropriate die variety/variety number on the label. Since I'm going to...
Actually I have a few sets that I'm collecting by die marriage (but I only note die state if my resources allow me that option). -- Capped Bust...
It's not been slabbed; IMO avoid it.
Agreed, not polished. But dipped!? Images aren't good enough to tell.
Separate names with a comma.
