Just a plating blister, common problem with the copper coated zinc cents.
It is just a horribly damaged cent, no way to say exactly how it got that way.
What about the coin do you feel is an error?
Definitely just a damaged quarter.
Just damaged, somebody machined the reverse down.
Well, they are worth one cent each! I assume you are wondering about the valuable 1982. That would be the 1982 D small date made of copper. You...
I'd keep the two wheat cents, not worth much but nice to have. The other two are spenders.
Not sure on your question. Do you mean the circular damage on the obverse?
Nope, just a damage mark from a coin roll crimper. Welcome to the forum though.
I agree the shape of the "3" is all wrong. Definitely a 7.
It's a cent, nothing more. The big one is the 1982 D small date copper. Only two are known.
It is just damaged by heat. The heat caused it to bubble.
Sorry to say your cent sounds like it is worth face value. Close AM or wide AM does not apply to 1969 S.
I've always been intrigued by the club ray varieties. There was speculation that they were made by one of the clandestine mints that also made...
Sorry, but the 1969 S is worth face value. Perfectly normal, just suffering from fifty years of wear and tear. Not being rude at all or shooting...
D is for Denver, also damaged in this case. Welcome to the forum though!
The average wheat cents are probably worth a couple cents each and as stated the newer cents just face value. Errors or high grade may change this.
Normal cents worth just that, one cent each. The 1961 D is nice for it's age but no real value.
I've always liked the Liberty Cap cents!
It has been damaged. No way to really say how it was done.
Separate names with a comma.
