What are you seeing? You are gonna have to post better photos and a question.
I am also at a 65 it looks to have nice luster, but it isn't booming.
I agree that is a bag mark. Sometimes these are left over planchet defects that weren't removed when struck. This is just damage.
Here you go https://doubleddie.com/144801.html The above link is to Wexler. It defines what worthless doubling is. Use this to your advantage so...
You are just seeing things @Jasongj It's not worth the effort of trying to argue your point. Your photos show absolutely nothing.
This is classic die deterioration IMO.
I think I see some frost missing on Washington. I therefore do not see a 67 or 68 grade. I am at a 66* cam
The 1970 UC sets had the business strike S mint cent. The proofs came in a sealed hard plastic case.
The best thing to do is just leave it alone. You have any detector videos? Peugeot Sound would be fun to see This time of year.
I hesitated in saying die deterioration. I only say that because MD is one of the biggest reasons for Die deterioration. It is a movement in the...
Every individuals key dates are usually gonna be the hardest to fill in the Dansco. Or type set, I find it difficult as I grow to find coins that...
You have any die markers to confirm them?
So, why did you go and pick on Eddie? Horse's tend to kick to the Jaw. Ya done good with the photos.
Entry post
Nice die markers. And a very good look at the doubling.
None of the markers fit. Ie the die polishing lines obverse or reverse. The marker you see on the column fits stage A and B but is worn away in C...
There is no need to be sorry, unless a member replies or clicks watch thread then they aren't notified when you post. If you start a new thread it...
Here ya go @Treashunt https://www.cointalk.com/threads/1981d-exposed-zinc-plating-test-subjects.342433/page-4#post-3607348
Brian's Varietys is a good site. Nice looking proof Walter.
Definitely the same guy. I also wouldn't be surprised to find other accounts he has started.
Separate names with a comma.
