What do you think about the two Morgans a few posts above?
That is what I usually think too. I’m really struggling with this market grading concept since I don’t think it was applied in this case. I could...
It’s not booming luster, but it’s there.
The weird thing is that it doesn’t look like it was left in a parking lot. I’ve seen some beat up low grade UNCs, yet this one isn’t like those....
MS 65 ...the toning and the light make it a bit hard to see the fields and cheek...it may even be a 66 if it’s a newer holder
I’m fairly certain that was his guess (he’s guessing the label has a lower grade than what it would get if sent in more recently). Edit:...
MS 65
Anyone expect an MS 60? [ATTACH]
Maybe @cladking would know?
My best guess would be that it’s a privately assembled set. Maybe something that was sold in a magazine or on TV? I’ve heard of the official...
Next up... [IMG] [IMG]
Summary of results: ----------------------- Coin 1 - Clad Dime (pg.1) - 2 (NT/MA) vs 6 (AT/QC) Coin 2 - Franklin (pg. 1) - 3 (NT/MA) vs 7 (AT/QC)...
The website was down at one point last year and then came back. This might just be temporary. For anyone who wants to access it, you can use the...
It's a PCGS holder @ron_c
It reminds me of the tab toned coins. I'm thinking it was some holder where the untoned part was where the coin was secured by the holder?
As others have mentioned, two coins can be correctly graded at the same level (say MS 65) but have very different levels of eye appeal (from ugly...
As @TIF mentioned, with Heritage all you can do is use the make offer option and hope for the best. Heritage handles the resale process. You may...
Please guess :) [ATTACH]
The technology wasn’t there to achieve computer grading in the early 1990s. Plus there will always be a level of subjectivity in grading that a...
I’ll admit it’s a bit strange. However, some people like me who collect holders are doing it to have an example of the history of grading. Just...
Separate names with a comma.
