[ATTACH] . From the Antwerp mint. A relatively nice coin.
[ATTACH] From the mint at Cleve. The "9" in the date is expressed as " IX " instead of "VIIII" as on some other coins. Please disregard my...
[ATTACH] The "0" in the date looks like a "C". The only collectible coin from Austria with this date, 7-10 examples known, per Levinson. The...
[ATTACH] From the Bruges. The date is fuller on the coin.
[ATTACH] Also from the Antwerp mint, a little rough.
[ATTACH] From the Antwerp mint. The date is fuller on the coin.
Things worked out better than I thought so I will post a few more. The hiatus might occur latter.
WOW!! A Chain Cent. Very nice!! I bet you are the envy of many EACer's. That and the 1796 Half Cent would definitely be the highlight of any...
WOW!! That half cent has seen some rough times. The Breen book on half cents states approximately 20 coins are known. Your coin is one rare bird....
I know I'm posting quite a bit today but I might not be able to post for a few days. We'll see.
[ATTACH] Uncertain mint. This variety with a short cross.
[ATTACH] A single Briquet also struck at Antwerp.
[ATTACH] Nice clear date. Struck at Antwerp.
[ATTACH] This is the first copper piece with a date. Struck at Antwerp. The copper pieces are some of my favorites.
That Dehli piece is choice. Are there any differences in the Islamic script on your Dinars and Dehli pieces.
@panzerman That Brandenburg is beautiful. I'm going to send my piece to Todd soon. Mine pales in comparison to your coin.
[ATTACH] Minted in Vienna. The "2" looks like a "Z".
[ATTACH] A double Briquet minted in Dordrecht.
[ATTACH] A relatively rare piece minted in Antwerp.
[ATTACH] Relatively nice coin. The date "82" is squeezed in, to the left of the cloverleaf mintmark.
Separate names with a comma.
