Thanks. They get even better, so I appreciate the work of the original collector. I hope they are photographed brightly enough - the reflections...
According to @Lehigh96 's excellent article, Jefferson Nickels Reverse of 38 vs Reverse of 40, I judge the three 1939's I posted to be 1939 REV OF...
1939-D [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Gonna have to ask the group on that one. I read the descriptions and looked at pictures. The Reverse of ‘40 should be sharper in the portico and...
Three small changes can vastly improve your posts. The image, by the way, is pretty good. These ideas are just to improve the presentation of the...
I found that I wanted to click on each of the images to see them bigger. So this reaction is in the "Oh boy, I want to see even more!" category;...
1939 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1938-S [ATTACH] [ATTACH] One year down, 80 to go...
1938-D [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Thanks! I fixed the typo! I'll post the D tomorrow, I expect.
I went off to buy a proof half at the LCS, but it was sold. Instead, I found a Dansco with an essentially complete set of Jefferson nickels. The...
I have been doing exactly this for several weeks. I set up an eBay search for only MS66-67’s. This is better than any 66 I have seen come up. At...
I interpret the definitions differently. In the period ending in 1817, a Specimen has a particular definition. Outside that period, it was a term...
[ATTACH]
What is the story, I wonder, behind a circulated Commemorative? In 1926, this was a new issue and sold for $1.00. As such, you would expect it to...
Very, distinctly, blue. Hard to capture. [ATTACH]
The red toning across the face makes this a beauty for only $12. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1985-S Proof [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
