Well, the numbers do not look right. Additionally, the S looks to be the wrong style for the 1926, and in the wrong place in relation to the date.
Howdy & welcome to CT. The 1926 S cent is considered a key date. At roughly 4 1/2 million coins minted, it is the 10th least minted cent....
Steve, I agree that spelling is not the real issue (as neither is the correct use of words such as "mute" instead of "moot" - the point is not...
Steve - first of all, length of membership & #of posts are not qualifiers for responding or commenting on this site! If you look at my profile,...
Yeah, both excellent!!!!
I'm not a real fan of toners - of the 50+ or 60+ Morgans that I have, I do not believe I currently possess one. That said, I do like to see them...
Nice! Is that a clashed rev.?
Here we go.....:confused::banghead::cyclops::dead:
Awesome note - so basically these type notes are blank on the reverse?
Wow, I like the oak branch on the 1 qindar!
That is very nice! What does the other side look like (I am not familiar with these)?
Wow, that is a really nice coin. Also like the 1931 1/2 lek. I wonder about the outcome of that encounter!
Well, welcome to CoinTalk! I don't know, it could be one of those 1982 "cast" cents the Mint was experimenting with back then. They decided it...
Wow, the "bare head" looks more like ET! Further proof of alien contact?????
Agree, Chris!
I really thought I might catch Chris off guard & elicit a response from him first. It's really confounding that these issues come up so often...
You should read "Strike It Rich With Pocket Change"! :joyful::joyful::joyful:
Wow, all are beauties, & while I usually stay away from strong toning, the '35 is one even I would go after! Congrats on these excellent selections!
That's crazy, a mabnet will stick to anything!
On this thread, it seems to be a daily attraction!
Separate names with a comma.
