I see no doubling of the eye, cheek or lips on the coin you've posted that is anywhere near comparable imo to the coin I posted. Not sure if you...
Nice, glad it straight graded for you.
I've seen plenty of similar DDO SMS Kennedy halfs dated 1966, but this is the first time I've seen a 1967 SMS with this type of doubling. Has...
Yes because if someone gets a fake box in and the TPG studies those die markers from not really (P) mint coins and then those markers are thought...
I like the 2008 1/10 fractional buffalo as well and prefer the burnished version to the proof version. Really wish the mint would bring them back...
Really? People who are seeking to ensure that every collector who wants a limited offering is able to get one via the original mint issued price...
Of course who knows if an investigation would uncover that the reason there was no order limit was to ensure X big dealer would be able to buy Y...
Yeah sure we all know the integrity of the TPG's is so great that they are going to reject the 500 qty in submission fee's on that monster box....
As someone who worked in loss prevention for a long time and has seen almost every kind of seal imaginable faked; including locking numerical...
I'd say it's a gamble on whether or not you think you can get 70's UCAM or DCAM depending on the TPG of your choice. If not for 69's I'm not sure...
Exactly whose to say someone didn't just find an old empty case with those specific serial numbers or whatever and refill them with any old that...
The mint is probably going to make the mintage way too high on these after the situation with the medals last year similar to what happened with...
I just have to say that even I agree with this. As at least it seems Carr gives the collectors what they really want...
I'm sorry stop with insinuating that those of us that don't like the coin whether that's because of the design itself or the pandering political...
If you read statements that were from the CCAC committee regarding how this coin design came about and was selected. To me it seems pretty clear...
Or that the mint designed a coin supposed to be for collectors, who realistically are the only people that care about the mints 225th anniversary...
Indeed, be really interesting to know how many of those sales were to commercial interests versus people who want it for their collection....
Longacre doubling imo
Imo they'll just increase the limited silver proof set mintage. And as @Cascade mentioned because those usually come late in the year, my personal...
I agree given that when originally conceived the gold price was low enough to where the mint probably never anticipated the coins even getting to...
Separate names with a comma.