OGH, nowadays Proof 64, what I said;)
Proof 64
The color looks off....definitely no silver alloy and I don't like the rim, too.
What he said......fake
AU Details, for the small holes obverse
Please have a closer look on picture 2. I wish his fingernails would be a fake, too....ouch.......I would never buy a coin from someone with...
I agree with MS66, very clean coin.
I would buy a handselected Indian Head Eagle in a PCGS MS63 slab.
Should technically be a 64, but they gave her a bump o 65, since it's a nice shiny coin.
The 1950 D is a somewhat better date in MS64 fbl upwards. In the condition of your coin /appr. xf45 it is just melt plus a small agio of one buck....
Yeah, eye appeal of a superior 66
Oh I see, all of them with weak D I guess:cigar:
Looks cool, which date do they show? 1915?
MS63
First 66+ Second 67
I'm not familiar with vams. But I see a MS66 PL coin, very nice.
Nice coins, all have a shot on MS66.
I love the toning on the Philie, but the San Francisco Washington is unbeatable.....where the heck do you find such beauties?
Luster is suboptimal, normally they tend to grade a point of two lower, when they detect market acceptable Cleaning. Your coin is borderline, a...
On this picture you can see the various degrees of toning, corrosion or what the heck else.......:nailbiting: [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
