I'll go 66.
The more I look the more uncertain I am...but....OK, I think almost certainly she made 65.
I'll call it in the Fine range. Decent looking, but not problem free, as has been pointed out. Checking EBay's sold auctions might be your best...
1727 Hamburg, Germany [ATTACH] 1726 French Ecu [ATTACH] 1720 Swedish 1 ore, looks to have been struck over something else. [ATTACH] 1718 Swedish...
64
Sorry, missed my slot. Carry on![ATTACH]
I started at 63, but will go MS64.
Judging by seated slabs I see, looks like a solid VG by today's standards.
I see coins as history, each individual coin tells a story. I think a few chops add interest to a coin. But ideally I would look for one that...
I know...that longshot guy sure has some ugly coins...:shame: 1769 Half Penny from Ireland...if only it could talk. [ATTACH]
I'm at 66 or better, I think she's beautiful.
VG details. Personally I wouldn't make any further attempts at cleaning, it is what it is.
63
conservatively I will say 64PL
My first impression...64
I could point out that the OP in post 325 said something about not going strictly year by year at some point. It seems like this thread is...
I can go along with that. Probably an old light cleaning that really isn't much of an issue.
1755 Bavarian Thaler [ATTACH]
1765 2/3 Thaler of Saxony [ATTACH]
1778 Bavarian Thaler of Karl Theodor [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.