I recently got this coin, but the toning is a bit darker than I would like. I am thinking about reversing the toning process a little to brighten...
MS-63
I bought this as a VF details for $50. In hand, it looks EF/AU. I may use a darkener to mute the shinyness of the areas affected by whatever...
PO-01
I can't tell if she is AU or MS. Your pictures have glare or blurriness in just the wrong spots. However, I am leaning towards AU.
NGC said G details, rim damage. I have shown this to EAC experts, and they have said that this coin is a solid G-06 (including the damage) that is...
My grade is EF-40 details. I bought this coin after it was HARSHLY cleaned. I saw that it was trying to retone, so I put it in an old envelope for...
My first thought was MS-64.
That's a heckuva strike for an 1825. I have only seen one other look that nice. I'm going to say AU-55. Luster looks 50/53, but the details look...
[ATTACH]
This is Not a "Guess the Grade," but athread where you give your own opinion and see if NGC stacks up to the consensus. The pictures are accurate...
I'll let you know what I have her at after people have a chance to respond.[ATTACH][ATTACH]
That camera is actually pretty good. Put the nickel on a black background and set the phone above on 4" of books or something. The lighting can be...
I stand corrected. What phone do you have?
I still have a hard time believing that coin is proof when it has such a weak strike. The rims also look a bit rounded. It may be a bit PL (your...
You can buy them yourself. ;) http://www.dc-coin.com
This is definitely not a proof. Look how weakly struck the left ear of corn is.
Think about it. What part of the minting process could produce such a defect? If you can't think of one, then it is PMD.
If I was buying, I'd say AU-58 from the pictures to be safe. It is probably MS-63/64 in reality.
Sweet! I thought your profile pic looked like a Gulfstream. That is actually my dream job.
Separate names with a comma.
