Yes, but a very small premium!
@GoldFinger1969 , don't worry about the slab damage. It happens. I find the PCGS slabs to be more brittle and susceptable to some of the thin...
I call foul...lol. You have to choose....
I like #1 or #3 best.
Here's one of mine, as I have a few. It's not an especially high grade and I plan to add another of this date and mm in a higher grade. When it...
Tough question. I think there is a market for signed PCGS slabs. I just don't know how big it is or what the premiums might be. I'm guessing...
I'll send you a PM later today with some books I have on the subject.
Thanks for posting this. Very informative. I think @heavycam.monstervam also had a point about the Morgan fields though. According to the PCGS...
I don't know the series well, but based on the photos, I think MS66 is a technical grade. As for FBL, it's hard to judge because of the toning....
I came up with a similar number this morning, although I didn't post it. Seems the "gold" was in a slurry of other materials if it was being...
This reminds me of gas prices in relation to daily oil commodity prices.
Are you sure you didn't get the packaging backward? From APMEX I get a white bubble pack glued to the inside of a rolled corrugated package....
I didn't think the Gunga Din posts were hijacking the thread, just adding some humor. I've seen worse hijack's go un-commented on by the mods.
Yes I watch them. And yes, sorry to say, I bought some coins from Art & Coin TV when I first started in the hobby. I consider it lessons learned...
I'm a fan of the Professional Edition. I have the 5th. Like @green18 I'll wait a couple more years to get an updated one.
I would have judged this a 64. As Lehigh said, I believe the reflective fields are showing more than normal. However, the heavy contact mark at...
That coin needs hospice.
I don't think that's a gouge in the coin. It looks like a lighting issue in the photo. Could just be a darker area of the toning, but it isn't...
MS63
I reported it.
Separate names with a comma.
