e="Morgandude11, post: 1831011, member: 37839"][ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Whats the story on that 1887? She...
Squeeze job
I just had a lot of fun reading last years thread. Some really cool coins traded hand of some really generous members. I sure hope we get more...
A couple from my attempt at a saints date set. Still a looong way to go. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Congratulations T.
We are not trying to beat up your coin, but most TPGs would normally call this a RB coin. They are just really particular with the red...
Wow Dexter, that 1887...drool...
I agree, it should be an RB. Not to take away from a lovely coin.
I don't know, that 98 is pretty spectacular too. Nice ones Dave.
Thanks Ken. I think that the half cent is my favorite of all.
And a few more of my favorite proofs... [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I would have to agree even though I can't see the reverse. Maybe a good crackout coin, i've had pretty good luck with thr OGHs.
Something whacky just happened there...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] How about some of my favorite proofs. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Just sent it out, hopefully the recipient really likes it. On a side note, this secret Santa is perhaps the truest to the spirit of Christmas...
With a manage of nearly forty million in Philadelphia and nearly forty seven million in Denver, I would hardly consider the 2009 nickels to be...
It looks more in the XF-45 to AU-50 range to me, still very nice.
I'm with rescal, either a planchet flaw or misaligned dies.
This looks like a cast copy, but it may just be the image. Most have a much heavier relief and bolder devices.
Looks like a small die chip.
Separate names with a comma.
