For the Philly mint, there are only a couple of minor ones reported. For Class VI doubled dies in general, there is not as much demand because...
I'm still not sure that it's the working hub variety. WHO means working hub obverse. What this means is that the doubling occurred on a working...
Since this was a doubled working hub that affected multiple dies that could be the case.
Do you see anything under the L of LIBERTY? This one is stronger than the doubling usually associated with the doubled working hub that is listed...
Definitely the right idea in looking for that distorted extra thickness. Unfortunately, the 74 large dates were just designed that way. When you...
1974 large dates have probably fooled us all at some point. Even attributors have listed one as class VI and then later delisted it after...
Nice find Jay.
Two things. 1) The tail of the two on both examples you posted have nothing to do with the doubled die, but instead are just unfortunate damage....
I'm gunning for you Simon. :D
I went 64 hoping that nick wasn't as bad as it looked in the photos.
Looks like a couple of people think it's a 66.
It's not a doubled die nor an RPM. What you are seeing on the date and mint mark is machine doubling. It should bring a few bucks for the clip.
Yeah, that a decent little clip find. Congrats!
That mark above the date is really bothering me if it's on the coin.
I would hope so Jim. Ad hominem attacks should never be tolerated. I'm sorry that I said anything that brought them about.
The rim looks like a slightly mis-aligned die. I'm not sure I'm following you on the extra initial.
This is a struck-through error. You can read more here:...
Technically a cud is a die break along the rim. What you have is a die chip. This particular area of the Roosevelt dime was very susceptible to...
Oops. Sorry Jello. I just looked at the barcode number.
Do you really want to know? http://coins.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleNo=460&lotNo=412
Separate names with a comma.
