[IMG][IMG][IMG] [IMG] These 2 coins are equal?
All you have to do is look at this coin and then #554 to know that PCGS failed on the 1945.
A 4 pt deduction for two tiny spots? That's over the top IMO!
Super weak strike, AU53
I'd say at least GSC takes care of their customers. As far as returns, I have yet to hear a bad story. We have to give them credit for that....
NICE! 62/63RB
Mostly issues with a weak strike, should have held it back.
Nice....definitely a solid 67!
I only submit using my local shop. You should establish a relationship with the shop, it goes a LONG way to helping you as a collector. I'm so...
Good luck with your endeavor! Like RLM said, your biggest problem is going to come with the 20's branch mint coins. The key and semi-key coins are...
Nice luster, but it looks like some distractions in the fields.
WOW! That's a blazer, I don't see how they could knock that one!
Harsh punishment from the woody haters at PCGS! I don't see hardly a single hit on this coin - guess I'll never fully agree with them on woodies.
I knew it! :cool:
Post mint/environmental damage.
OUTSTANDING! That coin was an extremely RARE find!
WG-66RB
Chicken! :D I'm betting it's not a big deal - not in a prime focal area and the reverse is almost perfect. A 4 pt deduction would not be fair...
Here's another tough one. I tell noobs to GTG this coin for fun. The luster is off the charts in hand.
I found this 1984D in a roll....these are some of the worst ever issued. Hey Joe - Did you post your 84D yet?
Separate names with a comma.
