Sorry - same verdict as before. It's a nice example of strong MD though, and if I had it I'd keep it.
This may help understand the process..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTytvWs5nV8
Good news!
Yes - rather than reinvent the wheel again, a list already exists that you could add new things to. It's under Frequently Asked Questions - more...
If that image is correct it looks like a ton of zinc bubbles on that cent, some of which may be giving the suggestion of the error.
The 09-S is a lower mintage, more valuable coin than the 08-S so that much is good. Lincoln 1909-VDB isn't that rare, but if you find a 1909-S VDB...
Oh well. :( You still have the 1877. Is there a 1908-S and 1909-S in the album?
Heavily worn, but I'd keep it.
Nice old album! As the album says, that 1856 can be worth a lot, more than the 1877. Not very many authentic 1856 exist. I'd like to see both...
Yep it has the shallow N, and the second 7 is a bit lower than the first, as it is on the 1877 IHC.
You're probably correct on that. Where did you find that one?
Now I'm not so sure. Especially with that second closeup - I'm not sure what's going on there.
Almost looks like a cud starting at 9:00 & going up to 10:00 ?
Definitely a key date! With that corrosion I'm not sure it would grade or not. That's a great coin to have! I've seen ones in a lot worse shape...
Picked this one up yesterday - lots of nice luster remaining: [IMG]
Nice gift Mat, and Happy Birthday!
I especially like that 1874!
I have one too, but was never sure if it circulated or if it's just old toning. One of my favorite commemoratives. [IMG]
I noticed that on the 18 too, but the picture isn't good enough to confirm that. I also see a lot of IHC 9s that look like that, and not...
No picture of the 1893 that I got for about $2, as a kid growing up in the Chicago area. I got this circulated 1892 yesterday - it closely matches...
Separate names with a comma.
