[IMG] [IMG]
Here is mine..... [IMG] [IMG]
I will be at table 905. Also have a table the preshow this weekend and am teaching the ANA photography course on Mon and Tues.
I would say 6 on the 79-CC would be fair. On the 1885-O first off I dont think that image is good to grade by. For grade I am thinking 64-65...
You mean I have plenty of time to sell it? :devil:
These came today, I like the pop outs: [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Looks like an 1900-O/CC
au55
I have never really looked at it for grade. I just thought the look was cool. I will get it out and see if I can see why it is a 63.
Here is my only slabbed cent: [IMG]
The coin is a PCGS AU55. It has a real nice look and I bought it because I just wanted a barber. The coin does show some nice mirrors. There...
The old light (lite) cleaning would scare me away. His straight on shots were not good enough to judge if the cleaning was damaging or to what...
Ok not way off with all those choices but none correct so far. It is in a PCGS holder with a grade, not a genuine.
I believe he is back in Washington working with Boeing.
It is very PL. That is why I did the "mirror" shot. So far the guesses are way off, which is part of why I did this coin. It is a tricky little...
A 63DMPL would be about a hundred bucks if graded. The mirrors look great but give it a good lookover for any cleaning or whizzing.
My only one...... [IMG]
I believe Fair (2) and PO (1) is Poor.
Just curious for some grade thoughts on this coin. It is in a PCGS holder, bought at FUN Jan 2010 from Glenn Holsonbake, ex:MFH coin. Fire...
Me too, on a MAC laptop.
Separate names with a comma.
