Amazing what a monitor can do, isn't it?
6897
7896
6894
Interesting! I think that die had seen better days!
1924- PCGS slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.
1923- NGC slabbed NOTE: If you don't vote in the poll, your vote will not be counted.
I just went back and looked. 50 rounds ago Duke was in the lead with a 0.409 and he was the only one under 0.5. I think you are really learning....
I thought surely this one would catch you. It is a weak strike. It really is not too bad of a coin. There are few marks on it and most of the...
A couple ticky tacks on the O in ONE. I may not have enough luster for a 66, but there is noting I see keeping it from a 65. Besides, I like...
You are going to have to explain how you can have no right numbers but 2 in the right place. That makes no sense.
Not quite yet. Page #1 works fine (up to 1926), but It will not let me get to anything beyond that.
NGC is not working for me either. However, the few that I have checked have no appreciable changes in the Nov/Dec time frame.
I see nothing that would keep it from a 67 unless the luster is down. From you pics, I do not believe that is the case.
From what I can tell, 1927 and later coins increased at that time. 1925 and a few I checked earlier did not increase. And what I said and...
I checked 70+ (only 2005 and on) and never saw an increase of more than a few at a time. This is every coin, and every grade I have checked from...
Since Heritage lists the graded populations (since 2005, anyway) in their titles, you can follow the populations for NGC and PCGS through the...
I am going to close this and http://www.cointalk.com/t154108/ tomorrow night.
I am going to close this and http://www.cointalk.com/t154109/ tomorrow night.
I cn't see it going for much more that a 66FS. I am not quite a pessimistic as bahabully, but close. $50 - $100
Separate names with a comma.
