Oops! Again
Let me guess, do a lot of her coins look similar? NGC would call that a 67 if it were red. y guess is it is a 66 brown by both.
I have no problem calling this one a 65. I just wish I could get the colors on my pictures.
I know my picture does make this look its best. It is really not too bad looking coin, but most do not like the graining. Shy the spot in "IN",...
It is a form of toning. Toning can happen in a couple years or not happen for 100's of years.
There are no scratches on a "woodie". The different alloy compositions just tone at different rates and to slightly to significantly different...
I can explain why I want a 1957 or a 1956-D cent. I am still looking for both in 67 - that I can afford. But these replicas at least look like...
The most common I have seen is the 1909-S (percentage wise, anyway). Basically, once you get past the mid 20's, the later they get, the rarer...
Would be nice - were it so. But it is not required to be part of the design.
OK, try these 2 (he has relisted them);...
I will be ending this poll tomorrow.
Wrong poll!
Wrong poll
You are closer than you think you are. Look closely at the "COPY" on both coins. For that matter, all of his walking Liberty halves. I am...
But that is not against the rules for a replica. Yes, it is a crappy replica, but that is good, isn't it?
If you have a problem with that coin, try explaining these; http://cgi.ebay.com/Replica-1957-Lin...item5888613775...
It is the same mistake on both coins I have pictured AND on his other 12 or so standing Liberty halves.
You got one of them. Plus, I think he might have shopped the date onto the obverse. Not so sue about that one
Look closely at the pictures. That is all you need to see.
Separate names with a comma.
