This is the only coin that I think might bet worth of sending to a TPG, but honestly, I would probably just keep it raw. If you are dead set on...
I'm sorry to say this is another coin that is not worth your time or money to slab. I don't think it would anyway, and you'd likely spend more...
I'm a bit confused (not hard to do ;) ). Are you implying that it toned this way IN the holder?
Another great upgrade! Congrats!
I was gonna say what the heck are you doing.... :loud: Until I realized that the first set of pics were your OLD coin. :D I like the new one...
I think that coin would slab, but it isn't worth it to do so. The coin looks below MS grade, and an 1890-S coin in this grade is worth less than...
I would not send the coin in because I do not think it would slab. Even if it did, you would be spending more on the coin than it would gain in...
If that's a proof, then I'm a buffalo. ;) :D Nice coin, but not worth sending in, IMO. They have to be practically perfect for this year to be...
Wanna bet? [img] [img]
That coin looks like a 64 or 65 to my eye -- I'd like to buy it in a 64 holder, and sell it in a 65 holder. ;)
When is starts to impair the surface below.
Wow! :bigeyes:
p.s. I had a very similar experience with a whizzed coin -- IN an NGC holder. :o
Wish I were there. Thanks for the log & please keep us updated!
First off, it's a POOR-1 not a PROOF-1. NGC uses PF to signify proof coins and PR to signify poor ones (PCGS uses PR for proof and PO for poor,...
Looks like a proof to me too.
No worries! Happy to help. :)
If that Buff got a 66 from PCGS, I would expect it will look SIGNIFICANTLY different in-hand. The coin has no luster in the photo, and PCGS...
As others have said (and I said in your other thread) -- die rotation is common on coins of this era and while I would stop short of calling a 90...
p.s. I think you did VERY well in purchasing your first 2C, BTW. That's a great coin!
Separate names with a comma.
