What would you grade these two Large Cents?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by oval_man, Sep 10, 2010.

  1. oval_man

    oval_man Elliptical member

    Both are MS (NGC). Exhibit A:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Exhibit B:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    The first one 65 the second one 64.

    On the second one is that die polish lines on her neck?
     
  4. oval_man

    oval_man Elliptical member

    Yes.
     
  5. KoinJester

    KoinJester Well-Known Member

    64 bn and 65 bn
     
  6. jerseycat10

    jerseycat10 Peace Dollar Connoisseur

    Agreed 64 and 65 respectively.
     
  7. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    64bn for both. I really like the first one best - seems to have nice color and a better strike. Also like the rim cuds. Also looks like the same variety for both coins.
     
  8. oval_man

    oval_man Elliptical member

    Thanks for the opinions. I'll let this go until tomorrow to see if there might be a few more.
     
  9. bigjpst

    bigjpst Well-Known Member

    I was thinking AU55-58 on the first looks like wear on the wreath on the reverse. The obverse looks like it may have some rub at the lock of hair on libertys forehead, but it also looks like weak strike. and 64bn on the second. But what do I know I may need this fella:foot-mouth:
     
  10. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"

  11. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    OP did say both were MS. ;) Plus I thought the coin looked familiar. :) I do a lot more looking than buying.
     
  12. bigjpst

    bigjpst Well-Known Member

    Yea I saw that after I posted...oops.:bangg: But the wreath still looks to me more like it has wear not weak strike. Is this characteristic of large cents? Or could it be argued this is something like cabinet friction?
     
  13. oval_man

    oval_man Elliptical member

    I thought I'd throw in one more (last one) to give perspective to the first two. Will post the slabs later today. Exhibit C (also MS):
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  14. oval_man

    oval_man Elliptical member

    Funny how tastes differ. While I like the first one a lot—very few marks and a good strike, certainly an attractive coin—I much prefer the color of the 2nd, which to me is richer.
     
  15. oval_man

    oval_man Elliptical member

    Good calls, grilledporkchop and jerseycat, as far as coming closest to the slabs. The 1st one's a 64, 2nd is a 66 but clearly a low-end one, would probably regrade 65+ IM0 (this one is mine and I paid accordingly for it). The least appealing to me is the 3rd, a 65; can't get past that gash near the mouth.

    The 64 is very nice but has carbon both obv. and rev.; I'm also a bit suspicious of the luster judging by the photos (esp. rev.). The 66, though softly struck, has no carbon and excellent luster in hand; great eye appeal, I think.

    A:
    [​IMG]
    B:
    [​IMG]
    C:
    [​IMG]
     
  16. oval_man

    oval_man Elliptical member

    I definitely see what you're seeing on the rev.: the slightly darker, duller spots on the high points of the leaves. I wouldn't consider this cabinet friction, which would be wear, but it could be a little rub (hand grease). Or it could just look that way in the photo; graders can see the luster of the coin in hand.
     
  17. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    While I would not call it cabinet friction it does kind of remind you of it. If you look at the second coin I would call that weak strike. The first looks pretty well struck on the reverse.
    Yep - I would like to see both in hand before I gave a final decision. :) Some of the darker browns are pretty nice in hand. I have a 1818 62RB that I just can't seem to catch the luster and color of. And I certainly agree on that third coin - that hit is just too distracting.
     
  18. 50cent

    50cent What A steal

    sorry but I don't grade much and I have no idea
     
  19. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Nice coins. That n-11 is superb!

    I was going to guess 63 & 65 -- I suspect the photos don't do either coin's luster justice.

    Thanks for sharing...
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page