This is why the old saying goes "buy the coin, not the holder." It amazes me how many so called collectors are basically "slab zombies" and never even try to objectively grade the coin while it is entombed in plastic. I also don't see many people looking for counterfiets or mis-authenticated coins. My point is it is your money and you should make yourself knowledgeable and develop your own "picky" grading talent before you blindly buy coins in an a la Bluesheet fashion.
If the coins are slabbed by NGC, PCGS, ANACS or ICG - counterfeits are extremely rare. So rare in fact as to be neglible.
These may be rare instances, but they have happened in the past with some not so cheap coins. Where humans are involved, nothing is impossible when it comes to making a mistake. I would still look at the coin very objectively before buying so that the state of "slab zombieness" doesn't set in.
Yup, they have happened. But I don't know of a single one that the TPG did not back up with their guarantee either.
True, but why would you not want to look to see with your eyes and brain that it isn't in the first place. I'd rather not have to go through the hassle.
Ahhhhh - so you're telling me that you can identify a fake that the TPGs can't identify. Shoulda thought of that. Not to sound incredulous, but I am.
The short answer is yes, sometimes if you know what you are looking for. $20 Gold Saints are prime, I have seen literally dozens of them in all types of slabs over the years. This is strictly my observation for my purchases as I did not want to offend the coin dealers that had them.
When you say all types of slabs - do you mean to tell me that you have seen "literally dozens" of fake Saints in PCGS and NGC slabs ? Again, I am incredulous. Extremely so.
YES...with NGC-who I like having the most. Again, this is my opinion and I don't have the coins to actually prove it, but I know what I saw.
Perhaps a slight case of exageration here.... Dozens means at LEAST 24 fake $20 St. Gaudens... I think you might be seeing things "Virginian". Perhaps you might benefit from a counterfeit detection course at the ANA... either that... or you should be teaching the course..:bigeyes::bigeyes:
Not all at once, one or two during a show at a time and the tell tale signs of fake dies, questionable surfaces with rounded letters and wrong fonts were a dead give away to me, but obviously not to the TPGs. I even had someone else check my opinion descretely. I am a horrible lecturer so that would be out and I am by no means an expert in the field.
Am I reading that right? " I am by no means an expert in the field" but you are finding dozens of fakes missed by the experts.:rolling: Really?
To bring this post back on topic, and re-rail a de-railed thread, here is a link to an excellent article by James Garcia talking about market vs. technical vs. EAC grading: http://boards.collectors-society.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1671655#Post1671655 What are your opinions on something like EAC grading, Doug?
I read Jame's article back when he wrote it, obviously I think he's off base. But that is many people's perception of what market grading is. Perhaps what it has become would be more accurate. But I'll not reiterate. Anyway, if you have ever noticed when grade estimates are asked for on early copper I tend to be a lot lower than most other folks. But my grade estimates will typically mirror an EAC estimate. I won't say that I agree with everything they do, I don't. But their system is much closer to reality/accuracy than the TPGs do. Pretty much everybody knows that I follow ANA standards. And that is how all coins should be graded IMO. At least it's an honest system. There's no bumps for rarity, popularity or pedigree. And the ANA system is market grading. The ANA invented market grading.
Wait... which are you saying? It's an honest system with no bumps, or it's market grading? Market grading takes market factors into account rather than judging a coin purely on its own merits. Something else you will undoubtedly have to clear up for all of us too, Doug. ANA standards can be used across series. Market grading cannot. How do you reconcile that?
No Mike, market grading does not do that. Value grading does that. That was the entire point of this thread. What you think is market grading, is not market grading. Again, no, ANA grading cannot be used (edited wrong word) across series. Even technical grading cannot be used across an entire series. Market grading and technical grading both make allowances for coins where the entire series is known to have been weekly struck. Grading has always been that way Mike, even Brown & Dunn, the oldest of all our grading systems, was that way.
no no GD coins can be weekly monthly or yearly struck it makes no difference sigh. what makes a difference is if its struck weakly. if i take a break u start imagining things