Has anyone ever heard of the Philadelphia Mint striking proof coins by mistake? I found a 1974 (no mintmark) Kennedy Half that is surely a proof coin---it has a mirror finish, but no cameo effect at all. Could it possibly be a proof struck in San Francisco without a mintmark? I tried to scan the coin, but the mirror finish doesn't show up in the scan. I know that there are coins that have been chromed, but, if the case, the edge was not chromed. It appears as a normal clad copper edge. I am certain that if the coin were chromed, that the entire coin would have been chromed, including the edge. Could I have stumbled upon some super error coin?
I've found several of these, dating from the mid '70's to a couple in the 80's. I think they're just mint-condition specimens that were early strikes.
I suppose I'll have to go ahead and invest in one of those USB microscope cameras---I've been putting that off until I can spend my eBay BUCKS! Any recommendations, or are the ones from the Chinese vendors good enough? Thanks
A microscope camera will not allow you to take full coin images of anything larger than a penny or dime. Chris
Hi, I see these all the time. They are one of a few things. Usually, it is a plated coin. Often, it is a polished coin. Never, is it a proof coin minted at Philadelphia Thanks, Bill PS: Any image will allow me to tell you which you have.
Hi Bill, Thanks for your response. I really have no good close up type camera to get detailed images. Could you or someone recommend the best camera or scanner or microscope imager best for coins?
I use an older Nikon Coolpix 950...They have some high megapixel stuff today for cheap but you need one to that has a good macro setting. I'll let someone else make a recommendation. For super closeups, I use a dino-lite computer microscope. Have Fun, Bill
My guess would be that it is either a polished coin or that it has been plated after leaving the Mint. Plating of JFKs is more common on the Bicentennial issues, but polished coins show up for every date.