Candidates for my first grading submission?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by gbroke, May 22, 2010.

  1. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    Hello,

    So I have the bug to submit coins for my first gradings. I am really trying to find candidates in the more common dates. I am terrible at grading (at least thats what the local coin shop said when he saw my book with my grades written on the flips) lol. So, I am struggling to find some that might actually get a high grade. Because of the five coin minimum for submission, I am hoping that the graded values would be higher than the cost of grading!
    Lets hear some opinions on these:
    Also, what do you think of the pics? Been practicing on pictures also.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Kevo

    Kevo Junior Member

    I wish i knew more about this series to help, but those nickels look sharp and problem free. Your photography skills are good as well. Just need to work on the lighting a bit.
     
  4. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    Yeah its strange how the obverses have different color than the reverses. They look the same in person, more brilliant like the reverses. I may have to actually buy a decent camera. This is just a 5 mega pixel. My droid phone takes the same quality pictures.
     
  5. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    The middle specimen in the order which they appear. The horn and tail on the reverse seems the most intact, as well as the motto/legend and other devices.

    Perhaps the last specimen in the order which they appear has a stronger obverse strike...??

    Only my 2 cents. I'm not especially into Buffalo nickels.
     
  6. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    All of them have this weird looking little black spots all spread out thru the whole coin. I think it's more prevalent on the Obv then the Rev but I see them on both. Do you know what that is? And is it really on the coins?
     
  7. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    It is on the coins. My guess would be PCV damage. :(
     
  8. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    If that is the case then I would not send any of them in...sorry :(
     
  9. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    I concur.
     
  10. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    You know after thinking about it, it came to me that all 3 of these have the spots. Do/did you keep your collection in PVC flips for awhile?
    Or did you get all 3 of these from the same seller?
     
  11. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned


    These were in my dads coins he gave me. They were not in containers when I received them. They were in a tube. Did old plastic tubes have PVC? I can say for sure they were in the same tube for at least the last 30 years. I was just guessing about the spots. What do u think?
    What else could it be?
     
  12. Victor

    Victor Coin Collector

    specs

    Funny thing, I have a high grade 1915-S nickel with numerous black specs on both sides. Because the former owner bought it as a MS-65 I sent it out to ANACS. That's where it is right now, out for grading.
    One dealer said the coin was "pitted". Another called them "fly specs".
    A quick acetone bath didn't remove the spots.
    I am thinking it may be something intrinsic to the 1915 date when I saw yours. Could it possibly be a planchet flaw or poor storage conditions at the mint in 1915? Or is it purely coincidence that mine is also a 1915?
     
  13. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    OK! What am I missing? All the coins are 1913 Type 1 MOUND examples, aren't they?
     
  14. Victor

    Victor Coin Collector

    Looking again I see you are correct. Not the first time I have mistaken that 3 for a five. As far as the mound, well that's lack of attention to detail.
     
  15. BR549

    BR549 Junior Member

    The hard plastic injection molded tubes should not contain the plasticizers that create PVC. The mfg's want the reverse, a rigid construction for the tubes and not a flexible plastic. If the cap was injection molded with threads, that too would contain little to no PVC. If it is a snap-on type lid that is soft...oh oh.

    If the Buffalo nickel's were improperly stored, say high humidity, cold then hot (visa verse) it is very possible environmental damage is/was occurring, especially if the coins were handled previous to the storage. A simple sneeze while your coins are laid out is all it takes.

    Good Luck
     
  16. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I think the best you would get out of any of those coins would be a genuine or details holder. The last one, I don't think would even get that. I would not submit any of them.
     
  17. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    Are you saying that because of the spotting or something else you are seeing?
     
  18. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    The last one looks to still have some PVC on it - they won't slab coins with PVC still on them.

    As for the others, you can see the traces of damage and they looked to be over-dipped as well.
     
  19. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    Yea I agree with what BR549 said about the tubes should not have PVC.

    And I do like your pictures though!
     
  20. gbroke

    gbroke Naturally Toned

    I just talked to my dad about the coins, well it was more about the 1804 LC in another thread, but... He said these were never in any plastic since he got them in the 50's. He or I do not know if there were pvc plastic flips for coins before then however.
     
  21. Tom B

    Tom B TomB Everywhere Else

    I think these are likely poor candidates for a submission and you will end up losing money in the process.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page