morgan dollars and sliders

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by mstng02gt, Apr 23, 2010.

  1. mstng02gt

    mstng02gt Junior Member

    Hello I was wondering if any of the professionals can offer me some advice on grading morgan dollars. I have to admit this can be a tough coin to grade so I would like any pointers. I see a lot of morgans that I simply can't tell if they are uncirculated or just the slightest weakness in the feathers.

    So my question is how do you tell the difference? Here is an example of a morgan that I have sitting here below. By all appearances this coin appears to be nice and white. It has 100% full cartwheel luster and everything points to it being a nice uncirulated gem. Except with the 10x the breast feathers appear to have the slighest touch of weakness (though all details seem to be present). How can you tell if coins like this are AU vs BU? What do you guys use to determine the difference? Or is this just the type of thing you just submit for grading and hope for the best?

    To best see the details enlarge the pic by clicking the bar on top.


    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    You look for signs of wear. On an AU coin wear will be a slightly different color than the adjoining areas. And it will show a break in the luster.

    Now on Morgans that can be confusing to some because Morgans are also commonly found with what I call frost breaks. These kind of marks are not commonly found on other coins because most other coins don't have frost like Morgans do. Frost can be thought of as being similar to the cameo effect you see on Proofs. On Morgans, a lot of them anyway, the devices, legends, dates etc will have the frost.

    However, frost breaks cannot be thought of as wear. Yes, very light wear would cause the same kind of marks. But with Morgans it is most commonly caused by the coins rubbing against each other in the $1000 bags that they were issued in straight from the mint. So Morgans are given the benefit of the doubt when it comes to frost breaks.

    Now make no mistake, if the metal of the coin is disturbed in any way then it counts as a contact mark as well. But ordinarily frost breaks typically only affect the eye appeal of the coin and can thus affect the grade because of that.

    Now I would have to write a book to explain all the finer points of grading Morgans, but it is necessary to know at least that much to tell BU from AU.

    Now on your coin, based only of the reverse pic of course, if you look at the wing on the left, the very tip of it shows a slightly different color. Typically that is caused by wear. But it could be due to your picture or the holder it is in as well.

    Without seeing the rest of the coin it is impossible to grade it. But based on the reverse alone a TPG would call that coin at least MS64 and it might have a shot at 65. Of course that is assuming that your picture is not hiding some marks or defects that I cannot see because of the glare or the holder.

    If you wish to know more, please read what you find here - Coin Grading. One of those links will lead you to a a complete book on grading that is on-line. Some of the others will suggest other books that you should get and read to understand grading.
     
  4. mstng02gt

    mstng02gt Junior Member

    Here is a reverse pic out of the holder and obverse. Ofcourse grade is important to any coin, but I am more concerned with wear and telling the difference. The discoloration on the wing though appears to me to be just the pic. Perhaps maybe the additional pics might give a better example. Thank you so much for all your efforts and detailed info above!! It is extremely useful!!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  5. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Hmmm - the other pics showed me something I missed on the reverse - nasty rim ding at about 8 o'clock.

    The obverse shows hits on the cheek, under the eye, and what looks like small scratches on the neck and in the right field.

    Grade would drop to 63. But yeah, I'd say it is MS.
     
  6. texmech

    texmech Wanna be coin collector

    This reminds me of an earlier thread I once posed. What if the Obv. & Rev. come in at different grades? What is the resulting grade? This is a good example. It's a shame about that hit on the rim. Are those bag marks on the Obv.?

    p.s., that is still a great looking coin.
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Obverse always counts more. But a coin is graded no better than its worst side.
     
  8. Marauderrt10

    Marauderrt10 Toners rule******

    It's MS but it's been cleaned, it won't grade at TPG
     
  9. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    I don't see the cleaning on this one. Can you point it out for me please.


    As for obv and rev grading different. I usually use the obv more but on Morgans I thought this was doubly so then say a Lincoln, am I correct?
     
  10. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Make that two of us !


    No, not really. Obverse always counts more - any coin.
     
  11. mstng02gt

    mstng02gt Junior Member

    I actually do see from the pic where you came to that conclusion. Though there is no way this coin has been cleaned with any sort of chemical or anything to whiten it. What you saw was 100% lighting giving it that almost polished appearance. There is very stong cartwheels and luster no signs of cleaning at all (also no hairlines or anything).


    And yes there is some bagmarks on this coin. The worst one is a light one in the fields to the left of her face. No matter what though I got my moneys worth on this one it was a $22 ebay coin. It just looked like a good example for my questions in this thread. You guys have been extremely helpful thats for sure!!
     
  12. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I wouldn't bet on that mstng. I'd bet a lot that coin has been dipped.

    And if that is what Marauderrt10 meant when he said it had been cleaned, I would agree. But I assumed that he was saying it had been harshly cleaned - and that, no way.

    Of course I know better than to assume :eek:
     
  13. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    Agree about the little dip in the water. As it's spring and we all want a little dip ;)
    All these years and most would have some toning if not.
    Not that it's a bad dip job. I like the coin alot.
     
  14. mstng02gt

    mstng02gt Junior Member

    Thats in interesting one. And also leaves me with more questions as I am the curious type :p Would a coin thats "been wet" be body bagged as cleaned? Would dipping a coin in water even do anything to remove toning? I would think that no matter what you were attempting to clean it with in order to make the coin "100% white" it would require some sort of scrubbing. Its no less white then many I have seen in pcgs holders, but not the same level of perfection as a brand new eagle either.


    Though I would be the first to admit you guys know a heck of a lot more then I do :p
     
  15. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    The "water" was a joke it's coin dip and no if not done to much then it's not bodybaged as most have had it done to them.
    When dipping it takes no scrubbing and don't ever do that!!
     
  16. mstng02gt

    mstng02gt Junior Member

    Like that nic a lene or MS70 cleaner? Doesn't that stuff give like a milky looking steel grey look to the coin? In that case it makes the coins look horribly ugly and I would never touch that stuff whether it would get body bagged or not. But there is no way I would clean any coin anyway. Unless I like sneezed on it and had to wipe it off lol.
     
  17. Marauderrt10

    Marauderrt10 Toners rule******

    looks to of been lightly cleaned, you can tell right above the date where the neck starts there what appears to be faint hairlines.
     
  18. mstng02gt

    mstng02gt Junior Member

    Have a better look :D Aside from a nasty bag mark on the neckline there are no hairlines at all.

    [​IMG]
     
  19. Marauderrt10

    Marauderrt10 Toners rule******

    good enough for me ;)
     
  20. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    Well does your coin look to have a milky looking steel grey look to it?
    Cause what I'm saying is yours has probably been dipped.
    And for you to state that "I would never touch that stuff" well you have one there I'd say.

    If you do it wrong or too much is when it looks ugly and ruins the coin. But many would say they don't want a white coin and they are all ruined though :D
     
  21. mstng02gt

    mstng02gt Junior Member

    I don't doubt it anything is possible. I just don't see it. Maybe cause I have never done it. I can say though that I have definitely seen ones that have "been left in there too long" and your right they are nasty lookin. This one if done lightly is fine with me because it looks natural.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page