1892 CC Morgan Authentic or Fake?

Opinions wanted on this coin, I see weird toning potentially due to a cleaning, some pitting and the distinctive hit on the reverse of upper left of the eagles breast. I could see this one going either way but more experienced eyes, what is your opinion?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/115506686946?hash=item1ae4bc2be2:g:45AAAOSwqLtjCiZJ&amdata=enc%3AAQAHAAAAoBGKa7MIuMon4t9Q9EM7sJtWMx0zw0rClarI47SgVg7zYoYZYHn64i8s3yr2B2IwDD3NgHhDqotbLKdIiM4weyPDgxK6gA%2BoPv5CpuWIWDguHpeyQwkvSVQWitqBi8n2sYQ4ZNAvjRH9rzBntJcs%2FHZoc5f1H8mXzYMlTd%2Bpaix2shIaFo7D0Lvg9az3KsACG1kkubN2x%2Fk606oum6ScDAc%3D%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR8Tvyt3cYA

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

The 9 and 2 look odd.

 

Classic fatty devices, classic Beijing toning.

 

It has been pulled. It was a modern Chinese fake.

 

I wouldn't buy it

 

Listen to the above posts.

 

And yet the seller has 100% positive feedback, and nothing in the description indicates this is replica. He is trying to sell Chinese crap as genuine. EBay doesn't do enough to discourage this practice.

 

Looks like someone informed the seller and they removed it. Good for them.

 

I didn't like the numerals in the date, especially the 1. The rev is pretty rough and granular, with tiny raised bumps in the fields. No bueno!

 

Why take the chance ? I would pass
if there’s any question.

 

Here are photos of it, saved and cropped, so that the site members can see one more Chinese fake.

 

Really looks artificially aged.

 

eBay reports Auction ended because item was either lost or broken. Hmmmm.......

 

Fake. Not even a good fake.