Sunday Morning Fugio Restrike Tifecta ...

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Fletcher, Mar 28, 2010.

  1. Fletcher

    Fletcher Junior Member

    ... Silver, Brass, and RB Copper :)

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mat

    Mat Ancient Coincoholic

    Wow those are nice :)
     
  4. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"


    What unique pieces, Just awsome!! :)
     
  5. mralexanderb

    mralexanderb Coin Collector

    Beautiful coins. Are they yours?

    Bruce
     
  6. Fletcher

    Fletcher Junior Member

    Absolutely ... I am looking at them right now :)
     
  7. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    Nice looking restrikes.

    Are these of the New Haven "restrikes"?
     
  8. Fletcher

    Fletcher Junior Member

    Yes, they are the New Haven restrikes ... although the term "New Haven" and the term "restrike" may or may not be correct. The jury is still out on the issue ...

    :)
     
  9. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    Yes. Jury is out... that's why I put restrike in quotes :)
     
  10. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    But that said they still can command a pretty penny! (pardon the pun)
     
  11. Coinman1974

    Coinman1974 Research, Research, Research

  12. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    You might put "New Haven" in quotes because we really don't know where they were struck. (The dies did supposedly turn up in New Haven.) Technically they are not restrikes because they aren't the original dies, and aren't really even close copies of the dies. The fact that they are nice is not surprising, they were never intended for circulation. They were created to sell to coin collectors.
     
  13. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    Totally right Conder. I just didn't want to be the one perceived as having rained on the guy's parade! :whistle:

    Pursuant to Bowers, written in the Whitman Encyclopedia of Colonial and Early American Coins (2009), Q. David Bowers:
    "Modern scholarship has suggested that the dies were newly created about 1859 or 1860 by the Scovill Manufacturing Company of Waterbury, Connecticut. These copies, dated 1787 and similar in general appearance to the originals, differ in detail and, most particularly, have narrow rather than wide rings on the reverse. Neither restrikes nor from New Haven, these are usually seen in a brassy alloy, sometimes called copper. Silver impressions are rarer, and gold rarer yet."
     
  14. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Oh I'm sure Fletcher know what they are, and even as mid-19th century copies they are still highly desirable. They are pieces to be proud of. I know I wouldn't throw them out of my collection if I was lucky enough to be able to afford them.
     
  15. Fletcher

    Fletcher Junior Member

    Fine then ... if you don't like those, I'll just post another trifecta :)

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  16. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

  17. Vess1

    Vess1 CT SP VIP Supporter

  18. Tater

    Tater Coin Collector


    Looks like Fletcher came to play ball boys. Nice Fugio's Fletcher and thanks for sharing the registry link.
     
  19. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    judging from the condition of those specimens, I don't think he's playing ball... he owns the team!
     
  20. Fletcher

    Fletcher Junior Member

    I am trying to put together a complete set ... I have another 20 or so varieties that don't fit into any registry set so I never get to display them. Unfortunately, I am now at the point where most of the varieties that are lacking from my collection are so rare that to find any one of them would be a complete coup. Nonetheless, the search continues ...
     
  21. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    yeah... judging from the condition of your coins, it would seem rarity would be the stopper rather than price!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page