I don't see any major issues that would present a problem so the answer is; yes, it could qualify. As usual, better photo's would be required to say it would qualify.
The luster looks good, but it's hard to tell if there is any light wear from the pics. If you can, post larger pics. CT will auto-shrink your pics if they're larger then 250 kb, so if your pics are larger then 250 kb try hosting them on a site like photobucket and linking them from there.
hi Guys if u can see them good enough let me know if there ms-65 are up if no let me know as well, but i am not going to have any morgans graded unless we think there ms-65 and up.
I agree that the 89 would likely be an au, seems to be some wear on the eagles breast and on the hair by libertys ear
You upped the ante from your original post of a MS grade to MS65. Based on that, I would say no to all.
Hey Thanks for your time guys, but are u denying these coins ms-65 because of the lack of luster, are is it that u are seeing wear are scratches and indentions, but thanks anyways from your opinions, but the reason why i want have um graded unless there ms-65 are up is because on ebay sales of these morgans the only ones that are making any profits are the 65's and up, unless it's a rarity coin such as the 1893 morgan, i will keep working on my pics because they are in fact bright and shiny in a lot of the area's. But i have decided not to purchase any more morgans off of ebay unless there ms-65 and up, alot of these coins on ebay the seller is cliaming there uncirculated and when u actaully recieve the coin there not uncirculated coins, even with a magnyfieing glass i can't pick up all the indentions and scrathes that the coin has in there pics, but i am learning and now saving my money until i can get a really nice graded coin, but i am still looking at the coin and not the grade.
