Here I go again

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Scubalou, May 25, 2022.

  1. Scubalou

    Scubalou Well-Known Member

    Pulled this out of a roll I got from the bank last week. I was blown away to find a 1969 S, in this great a shape - and I'm in MA. Upon closer inspection I see what seems to be split serifs in the date and the Y in Liberty. What do you think? 5.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

    • 3.jpg
      3.jpg
      File size:
      260 KB
      Views:
      32
    • 4.jpg
      4.jpg
      File size:
      265.5 KB
      Views:
      26
    • 7.jpg
      7.jpg
      File size:
      432.4 KB
      Views:
      30
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Sorry Pal. Nope. Nada. Not even close. You do have a tiny Die chip in the Mintmark though... :)
     
    spirityoda and 1stSgt22 like this.
  4. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

  5. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Do you mind if we inquire what program you’re using to make those arrows? You got the best arrows.
     
    VistaCruiser69 and 1stSgt22 like this.
  6. Scubalou

    Scubalou Well-Known Member

    Sure, it's just what came with the Celestron microscope.

    Thank you, I did try to pair it up with 1969-S DDO-002, 2-O-V-CW from K-9, but the mint mark on mine was too far east, under the 6. That is however the closest I came.
     
  7. Scubalou

    Scubalou Well-Known Member

    Okay, thank you. I rather thought the MM had a hit. Could you please tell me this one time why the split serifs, especially on the Y and the 6, do not indicate doubling?
     
  8. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    True doubling causes an increased thickness of the area, so the overall width is Normal thickness + the additional doubled portion. Other types of doubling effects ( that are not "true" doubling effects )will show show separation into thinner areas that together will be approximately the original thickness. The 55/55 is an easy one to see. Notice that each section that overlaps tend to blend together at same height rather than total separation and the 2 together is much thicker than original. But it is for classical doubling with double squeeze production and a '69 would be in that era. I do not see such doubling in your example. Jim

    55ddOlib.JPG
     
  9. Scubalou

    Scubalou Well-Known Member

    Thank you very much for sharing your expertise.
     
  10. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    No Problem. Happy to do so. Jim
     
    Scubalou likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page