Yeah but, it's really rare because...

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by LukeGob, May 14, 2022.

  1. LukeGob

    LukeGob Well-Known Member

    A lot of common types of ancient Roman coins have a rare, or even very rare, variation. Like a certain mint, a specific mint mark, a control symbol or a bust type, etc. etc. It's undeniably thrilling & fun to find & own any rare coin. And this is usually a cheap way to own an R4 or 5. A coin that you could you pick up a pretty nice example of the basic type for a couple bucks any day, but one little letter or something makes it rare (and still possibly a couple bucks).
    I got this Theodosius a bit ago. The overall type is reasonably common; AE4 Lg module, VOT/XV/MVLT/XX; but from Siscia it's very rare for Theo. RIC IX 31-b is closest. They saw 1 example, seemingly halved. It was officina B, so technically unlisted for A, as this coin is. Rated R5, though that's almost certainly changed by now. Still, it's fun to own a coin that's rated R5/unlisted in RIC.
    17mm X 16
    1.2g
    In Ex: ASISC (a lot clearer in-hand)
    Purchased from Vcoins dealer, London Ancient Coins
    20220501_184047(1).jpg 20220501_184206(1).jpg
    So, in that vain, what rare coins of a common type do you have? What obscure control symbols, unusual head-wear, rulers facing the wrong way or on a type that barely predated their death, low mintage mints or officina, rare mint marks, rare changes to devices or whatever else on otherwise common coins do you have an example of?
    Thanks for posting, if you do. Hopefully we get a nice variety. I'll post some examples of different differences too.
     
    robinjojo, octavius, ominus1 and 13 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    That's a very nice example of that coin. It's well-centered and with legible inscriptions and a lovely patina. Well-done! And it's fun owning rare varieties, as you say.

    This bust type is very rare on this issue.

    [​IMG]
    Commodus, AD 177-192.
    Roman AR denarius, 3.42 g, 18 mm, 12 h.
    Rome, AD 180.
    Obv: M COMMODVS ANTONINVS AVG, laureate and cuirassed bust right.
    Rev: LIB AVG TR P V IMP IIII COS II P P, Liberalitas standing left, holding tessera and cornucopiae.
    Refs: RIC 10a; Cohen 301; BMC 4.

    This one with the laureate head is the usual variety.

    561946.jpg
     
    robinjojo, octavius, ominus1 and 8 others like this.
  4. ambr0zie

    ambr0zie Dacian Taraboste

    Here is a coin that is quite rare because of subtle differences. I bought it just because I wanted a good portrait of Trajan and investigated later.
    upload_2022-5-15_11-44-57.png

    Trajan quadrantes with she wolf are not very rare. But with this legend IMP TRAIANO AVG GER DAC P M TR P COS VI P P it is quite rare.
    Common legend for them - IMP CAES NERVA TRAIAN AVG.
     
  5. hotwheelsearl

    hotwheelsearl Well-Known Member

    I used to have a small VOT Theodosius, but I don't like that reverse so I have this one instead now.
    Theodosius I AE4 RIC IX Constantinople 83b.JPG
     
  6. LukeGob

    LukeGob Well-Known Member

    Nice find, good portrait indeed. Is the relief as high as it looks? So many letters on a little coin, beautiful
     
  7. ambr0zie

    ambr0zie Dacian Taraboste

    Yes, it is. Can't remove the black deposits though.
    The coin had a red/orange color when I bought it. The cleaning experiments I did as a beginner turned it into this color. The deposits remained.
    I stopped experimenting on it as the coin is rare and with very good details.
     
  8. Finn235

    Finn235 Well-Known Member

    I sometimes wonder how many coins are "rare" versus "who would even take the time to look at this?"

    This Claudius II is apparently unique and unpublished because the reverse is FIDES EXERCITI and not EXER or EXERCI Claudius II FIDES EXERCITI.jpg
     
    Bing, Carl Wilmont, robinjojo and 5 others like this.
  9. seth77

    seth77 Well-Known Member

    There's a historical reason why Theodosius is rarer in this issue. These large module AE4s appear in the West in anticipation of Gratian's quindecennalia in 381-2. As part of Illyricum, Siscia was under the direct authority of the western emperor which was Gratian. At this time there was also quite clear that Theodosius would not conform to the role of junior partner and was showing distinct signs of independence in the East, including also minting his own AE types.
     
    Last edited: May 15, 2022
  10. Orange Julius

    Orange Julius Well-Known Member

    Here’s a good example of a rarity that very very very few people would care about. The below coin is an unknown, unpublished variant of known coins with Providentia, a transverse scepter and globe. The known variants have the legend of either PROVID AVG or PROVIDEN AVG… but my coin (hold onto your hats here) has the full PROVIDENTIA AVG for the reverse legend. I’ve been looking for other examples of this coin for years and have yet to find a single example. However, as rare as it is… I’d probably struggle to get more than $10 for it on eBay. I like it, but it is an ugly coin.
    GallienusUnknown.jpg
    Gallienus - PROVIDENTIA [AVG]

    I posted about this one on FORVM awhile back… here’s the thread if interested: https://www.forumancientcoins.com/board/index.php?topic=119541.msg723838#msg723838
     
    LukeGob, Bing, Carl Wilmont and 5 others like this.
  11. seth77

    seth77 Well-Known Member

    Same series with the OP, but the regular issue for Gratian at Siscia for his quidecennalia:

    gratian vot.jpg

    A similar smaller type, but later, from Alexandria, marking the decennalia of Theodosius I but minted for Valentinian II, misspelling his name as VALENTINIAVS and from the third officina, usually reserved to Theodosius:

    val2 alex.JPG


    A Theodosius II from Nicomedia, no officina mark, unlisted but there is a precedent at Constantinople at the same time with two issues, one with the longer mintmark CONS and another with the shorter mintmark CON:

    2025993_1625040019.jpg
     
    LukeGob, Bing, Carl Wilmont and 3 others like this.
  12. Victor_Clark

    Victor_Clark all my best friends are dead Romans Dealer

    Coins from the VLPP series from Siscia are pretty common but this coin is not listed in RIC, but not so rare that I haven't had other examples...this is the nicest one though. There were also four examples of this type in the Bikic-Do hoard, # 388- 391. Two from officina gamma, one from delta, and one from epsilon. it should come after RIC 100.

    On the reverse, the stylus that Victory is engraving the shield with was engraved over by the P of "VOT PR"

    Siscia_VLPP_Bikic-Do_388_0.jpg

    Constantine I
    A.D. 319-320
    18mm 3.1g
    CONST-ANTINVS AVG; laureate helmet and cuirassed bust right.
    VICT• LAETAE PRINC PERP; two Victories stg., facing one another, together holding shield inscribed VOT PR on altar inscribed with the letter S.
    In ex. ΓSIS•
    RIC VII Siscia--; Bikic-Do hoard # 388- 391
     
    LukeGob, Bing, Carl Wilmont and 3 others like this.
  13. LukeGob

    LukeGob Well-Known Member

    See! That it's freaking cool. A unique coin for a couple bucks. Great find.
     
  14. LukeGob

    LukeGob Well-Known Member

    I got one in the mail today. A Constantine, SOLI INVICTO COMITI, a pretty common type. But at Ticinum, one of the control symbols used was probably the first intentionally Christian symbol on a Roman coin. There's a Cross in the L field & a Star in the R; the cross is reasonably rare & a cool checklist item. Valentinian has a great page on early Christian symbols that gets into it. From Savoca.


    20220516_173722(1).jpg 20220516_173737(1).jpg
     
  15. LukeGob

    LukeGob Well-Known Member

    Interesting. Thanks
     
  16. LukeGob

    LukeGob Well-Known Member

    The Theo. II is interesting. Nicomedia changed their MM not long after, if not immediately after, that issue(I think, I oughta check before running my mouth). His monogram pieces from a bit later have both SMNA & NIC. I wonder if they did transition to a version without an officina like Constantinople before changing it. Cyzicus & Thessalonica switched to a different officina-less MM soon after under Marcian. Interesting.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page