Repaired or Counterfeit 1871-CC Quarter?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Jack D. Young, Apr 19, 2022.

  1. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Discussion in another forum...

    1871-CC with obvious damage sold previously had a lookalike sell in another venue.

    cert.jpg obv combo.jpg

    rev combo.jpg

    The raging question is if the coin on the right is the same example after repairs?

    ha obv.jpg
    raw obv.jpg

    date.jpg
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2022
    NSP and Dave Waterstraat like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    okay, this will take a moment.

    If you look a the two almost parallel scratches - from the 7 up to the leg, now look at the 'other' coin.

    I can see traces of that same position scratch at the top leg down to the left. And below to the top of the rock.
    Plus the 'stain' above the 8, looks like it could have been smoothed to remove that scratch.

    Strange, but the 7 looks okay, but it may be a masterful job of repair. Emphasis on 'May be'.
    Me thinks it is a repair job
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  4. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

  5. Timewarp

    Timewarp Intrepid Traveler

    I vote yes. Look at the ding in the middle vertical line in the shield. There's also two on the left side of the shield on the reverse of the coin. click on the pic to enlarge.
     
    -jeffB likes this.
  6. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    I see enough to say "yes." But is it the same coin, or source coin for a counterfeit?
    1871-CC_obv combo.jpg
    1871-CC_rev combo.jpg
     
  7. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    After looking close I think the right coin is a masterful counterfeit made from the source coin
     
    Jack D. Young and charley like this.
  8. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    I am thinking source coin - too much of the abuse (dings and such - especially around the rim) are missing on the 2nd coin. Why the "O" in dollar and 2nd mint mark "C" on the reverse were not fixed on the counterfeit die is a mystery.
     
    Jack D. Young, KBBPLL and charley like this.
  9. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    I'm thinking source coin and counterfeit as well.
     
  10. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Maybe @justafarmer can do an overlay to see how well they line-up!

    Point of interest, the damaged example was removed from the PCGS slab after the Heritage sale and sent to SEGS prior to an Aug 2021 auction...

    listing.jpg listing.jpg
     
    charley likes this.
  11. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    At this time that would be a problem. My computer carrying my CAD System crashed. Currently being analyzed by technicians to see if it can be revived. Didn't lose much data - almost all my CAD Drawings were also arcived to a flash drive. I am sure there are a few that hadn't been archived. But I do have worries. My CAD system computer ran XP as the operating system. If forced to a new system I may encounter a file compatibility problem with my archived files.
     
  12. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    @Jack D. Young what auction site sold it (the original) in the SEGS holder? From the CU forum (where I'm banned) the doctored/fake coin sold April 16 for $16000 on Proxibid via Gold Standard Auctions. Seems like whoever sold it in the SEGS holder might have some, uh, connection to the second doctored/fake coin. I'm agreeing with @justafarmer and others that the second example is a fake made from a doctored transfer die - the rims and other dings indicate it's not the exact same coin. I wonder if reporting to Proxibid would do anything, since it was just sold 4 days ago. I also wonder how long before we see another example with the same PUPs, or if this was a one-off. $16k is a tidy profit.
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  13. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

  14. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    Then the answer is "yes", it is the same example after repairs, but it is counterfeit?
     
  15. charley

    charley Well-Known Member


    Mr. Young, wasn't the original purchaser of the PCGS piece "reimbursed"?

    There was a gossip line for a while, that the piece went to a certain Chicagoan, prior to the SEGS encapsulation.
     
  16. justafarmer

    justafarmer Senior Member

    No - the coins are not the same. The thinking is the damaged coin may be the source coin used to make counterfeit dies which struck the other coin
     
  17. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    I know this... (see my previous answer). I am asking KBBPLL if that is what he meant, by the 2 somewhat different posts. The answer to the OP question can't be both.
     
  18. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    Sounds interesting. I like gossip about somebody who might have made a $16k counterfeit. Tell us more!

    I don't know anything about this coin, nor have I ever held any seated liberty quarter, let alone a 1871-CC quarter. Initially I was pointing out features demonstrating that it's the "same" coin, but then I became convinced that others were correct - the original coin became a doctored die that produced a fake.
     
    Mainebill and Jack D. Young like this.
  19. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    I hadn't heard this @charley ; would be interested in more details!
     
  20. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    Well it’s about time you did. Lol. Seated liberty coins are highly addictive. I’ve never had or held a 71-cc but have had a ton of seated quarters. One of my regrets was selling my monster toned 76-cc when I needed money a few years ago
     
    KBBPLL likes this.
  21. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I think a case can be made for either a repaired coin, or a transfer die counterfeit. would like to know how the coin ends up.
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page