For me it‘s the 10 Dollar Indian Head Type 1 (1907-1908) Most of them in AU and low MS slabs are more of the high vf or xf condition.
Nice logic. A perfect way for TPGs to not be responsible or liable for anything. If they say its an XF45, by definition it is and therefore they cannot make a mistake. Heaven forbid they actually have to grade by a standard created by the ANA right? Better to say they use their own grading standards so they can adjust grades as they like to maximize revenue and minimize costs. Sounds like a good lawyer and CPA came up with this business plan... TPGs win, collectors lose. Oh well.
What standards would those be? The ones they report in the book about standards they didnt make or control and say so?
Boo! That's not in line with our guesses, boooo! Why are those commonly overgraded? Is there some reason for it that you know of? Rarity?
Fish on ! LOL ! Sorry, teasing you at your expense. I'm pretty sure he wasn't really answering his own question - what's the most commonly over-graded - he was making a statement, specifically designed to to elicit a response, kinda like yours. That said, he's right, 3 cent silver and $3 gold are commonly over-graded. But since there are so few of them to begin with, and even fewer that have been graded, would that answer really qualify for being an answer to the original question ? Well, it could be argued that it does because the statement is indeed accurate. But it could also be argued that it doesn't qualify because of the numbers of graded coins being considered. $3 gold numbers in the fairly low tens of thousands total graded, 3 cent silver almost certainly less than 20,000 total graded. But Morgans and Lincoln cents - they each number in the millions total graded. And many, many other coins also grossly outnumber the total graded coins. My point of course that's it not really a fair comparison for that reason. But like I said, it could be argued that it is. Bottom line, I'm pretty sure Mike did exactly what he was trying to do. But that's Mike