GTG 1880 s Morgan...

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by mrweaseluv, Mar 16, 2022.

?

GTG

  1. MS67

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. MS66

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. MS65

    4 vote(s)
    12.9%
  4. MS64

    16 vote(s)
    51.6%
  5. MS63

    10 vote(s)
    32.3%
  6. MS62

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. MS61

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. MS60

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. PL

    17 vote(s)
    54.8%
  10. DMPL

    2 vote(s)
    6.5%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    Nice example . I think it got A 64 because its a 80S
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    She has arrived.. I think these pic's show her off nicely :D They aughta, these the best of about 40 shots lol.. darn hard coin to photograph :D
    20220319_174403.jpg 20220319_174352.jpg
     
  4. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    Good pics, great coin
     
  5. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

  6. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Late to the party again but I will be honest, my first impression was MS-65. Nice Morgan thank you.
     
  7. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    Too late for the action, but my first guess was 64 PL...it may go to a +.
     
  8. Mac McDonald

    Mac McDonald Well-Known Member

    In my view, since TPGs are grading from subjective opinions, it could be argued that there are no "mistakes"...and that's the problem with TPG as it is. Where are the consistent, across-the-board standards...in this case to support that "frost breaks are extremely common on PL coins" and therefore should or shouldn't be considered in effecting the grade...? Same for the "few bag marks" in the very first/top photo (they can best be seen)...if all the marks/scratches different from die-polish lines in the field/front of the face and dings from the eye-socket, down the cheek/face, to below/front of the ear aren't bag marks, what are they...? And whatever they are, shouldn't they factor in the grade...?
    Still, this is a very nice coin to be sure...I really like it...with its many attributes. But to me, based on MY experience and opinion both same and different from others, I think the 64PL is correct for this coin, and that the coin in total, if mainly because of the facial area, doesn't quite rise to a 65 level. As long as TPG exists as it does, we'll always have such "mistakes"...more of debate/controversy, really, and many more than necessary...to live with. TPG up to today but more in the last 10-15 years or so has fit a certain, ultimate narrative...not unlike with term limits...where many want change but those who don't are the ones who control and profit from it most. Enough. Happy first day of Spring...!
     
  9. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

  10. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

  11. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    I think your right on the ball. I’m guessing and liking your guess
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  12. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

  13. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    I like it, it is well deserving of the grade. Thanks for sharing.
     
  14. Marsden

    Marsden Well-Known Member

    Some more examples to help you feel even more fortunate. The PL bar for that particular model is ridiculously high IMHO.


    edc90c87a44bc09c38eca2df1d2486764d9ed6da-14.jpg 83c3f6c5c5dd99404e1c24201c630735b9ef9cdd-14.jpg ef105535c4ba4ab1c806c4c20de03df6df764a4b-14.jpg
     
    mrweaseluv likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page