Gold $3 and $5 Counterfeit Input

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Mark Metzger, Feb 27, 2022.

  1. Mark Metzger

    Mark Metzger Well-Known Member

    Hey there folks,
    I have a few older US gold coins that I was hoping to get some input on. I know there are commonly counterfeit (Lebanon) so I am looking for verification. I see some tell-tale spikes near the rim of the 1854 but they don’t match some photos of known fakes. Anyhow, I’d love to know what people think.
    Thanks!
    2E818D55-C291-4CF1-855A-89316A4932EB.jpeg 3087E433-5BAC-48F7-8922-408A57494A0C.jpeg C29A457D-3FED-453D-83C8-322F9B39D897.jpeg D4C3E943-E0C5-4308-B032-287897D9F11F.jpeg E0D3EA5F-5EE3-49DB-9F21-75E2E073FB14.jpeg BB770D9E-47E7-4DFA-99B5-6EBF378622B5.jpeg 444C6CC9-BF01-46BB-A5E4-75533697156D.jpeg 2DEF9456-EDA7-40C1-89C4-306ADE9CC3A9.jpeg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

    All of them look legit at first glance.
    Color is ok. The Second one looks a bit off, but this depends on considerable more wear.
     
    micbraun and GoldFinger1969 like this.
  4. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I don't like the 1854; I see the spikes by the dentils on the rev at 3 & 9, and a blob near 2. also, the shape of the numbers in the date looks wrong compared to HA archives. I'll check the others if I have time.
    On the 1882, I see rev spikes near the dentils, and overall the letters and numbers look mushy.
    the 5$ looks ok.
    I recommend having the $3's authenticated.
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2022
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  5. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I can't be sure but the 1882 may be an Omega counterfeit.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  6. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    I have doubts about both of the $3 gold pieces. The relief does not look right on the 1854. It looks too shallow, and I don't like the wire rim or the "extra rim" around the coin. Here is a certified example.

    1854 $3 Gold whole.jpg

    The dentiles on the reverse look inconsistent to me on the 1882. They are thick on the lower right and thinner on the upper left. I also don't care for the two colors on the obverse, which almost look like the gold plating has worn off the piece.

    The $5 gold looks okay to me.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  7. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    We need "an Insider"......:D
     
    Insider likes this.
  8. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

  9. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    I am with @johnmilton, the 1882 $3 looks totally off, especially the wire rim makes me think it’s a counterfeit.

    I’d send them all to ICG for authentication. It would be a great learning experience to see what they say.
     
  10. Mark Metzger

    Mark Metzger Well-Known Member

    Do you suggest ICG for authentication because they are the cheapest option or do they specialize in such things. I’m inclined to take them down to the most reputable coin shop in town and get their input / have them test them for purity and then if they are gold but counterfeit, just sell them for melt. Unless, of course, there is some collectible market for such counterfeits.
     
  11. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    I said ICG because I believe they have currently much faster turnaround times and also because it would be the cheapest option for authentication. If they turn out to be authentic it would be much easier to sell them.

    @Insider mentioned there’s a special for CT members. Maybe he can tell us already something from the pictures above…?
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2022
  12. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Hard to authenticate by images BUT...:D

    Both $ look counterfeit. The 1882 is more deceptive than the 1854. The $2 1/2 looks genuine.

    CT members get a $10 rate and we return coin in 2-3 weeks or faster.

    Next a new subject: I'm really sad. :( I was going to post a new thread because of all the "junk" I've seen today from good folks but I'll mention this here. If you are buying "raw" coins from anyone YOU HAD BETTER BITE THE BULLET and have a few checked at a TPGS. It is sad to get 20 coin orders from new customers who want their "gems" slabbed only to find out that just about everything they have been buying for DECADES is a "details" coin!
     
  13. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Tell your dog I said hi!

    Um there are two $3 dollar coins and one $5 dollar coin. Seriously what the hell are you babbling about?
     
    Mr.MonkeySwag96 likes this.
  14. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    @Insider certainly meant “both $3” coins and mixed up the Liberty half eagle with a quarter eagle… no big deal. I think it’s great he chimed in.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2022
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  15. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    CoinCorgi, posted::sour::confused::rage::yack::yack::yack::yack::yack::yack::yack::yack::yack::yack::yack::yack::yack:.

    :yawn: You :troll: got me little fellow...:dead:. I better get my eyes checked. :D
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  16. iontyre

    iontyre Active Member

    Check out the 'I's in United and America on the 1854 $3. Notice both have an identical missing serif!! That would be very highly unlikely on a mint produced coin.
     
    johnmilton likes this.
  17. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Tell your dog I said hi!

    Certainly? My take away is that if he can't get the basic info correct, then any opinion expressed is suspect. I wish he'd put me back on his ignore list. :)
     
  18. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    iontyre, posted: "Check out the 'I's in United and America on the 1854 $3. Notice both have an identical missing serif!! That would be very highly unlikely on a mint produced coin."

    Good Eye! We noticed this back in the day when some dealers questioned if we had certified a fake. We let them know that the counterfeit die copied that defect from a genuine coin. Unfortunately, I don't remember the date of that $3 (1857?). [EDIT: I just checked. It was 1857 :happy:] What you have shown is that very often (in the old days) the counterfeiters used an identical die (side w/o the date) to produce coins with several different dates.
    This was one way many C/F's were detected back then. For example, we found
    fake $2 1/2 gold coins spanning several decades made with the same reverse die!

    @CoinCorgi,

    I'm not interested in any of your "takes." That may be the reason I put you on "Ignore" sometime (?) in the past. :facepalm: :sorry::(
    I'm :bucktooth: the real loser here. It's unfortunate for me that for all that time (?) I missed out on all your :bookworm: very informative posts dealing with numismatics. I consider you :cigar: to be a very important "foil" around here. I wish I had your talent for humor.:D
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 3, 2022
  19. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Tell your dog I said hi!

    I'll give you one chance to guess what my "take" on this statement is.
     
  20. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    Good catch!
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page