GTG-1942 S nickel

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

MS64? Could you post larger pics?

 

We need better pictures. It's arguably gem.

 

MS66

 

Sorry these are the sellers pics can't do anything.

 

What's he she or it asking?

 

It's hard to argue with Paul when it comes to these....

 

Normally I would agree, but these photos are really small, I was basing my guess solely on luster and the cleanliness of the obverse focal areas. I can't imagine this coin being anything but gem, but the size of the photos bring the entire MS65-MS67 range into play.

 

That's exactly where I am.

 

Using Firefox on a PC one can right click on the pic and select "open image in new tab". Doing that, the pic can be enlarged x5 from the bookmarks toolbar. Having done that I find the photo too blurry, and bright in spots, to make a judgement. Could be anything from a 55 to a 66.

 

66, based on inadequate pictures.

 

Poor photos preclude my guessing.

 

A lot of shadow on the obverse image and it could be chatter on the shoulder.

 

That is the reason I couldn't go MS67.

 

Here's the reveal,the only really noticeable place for chatter is on the shoulder as stated.Do I agree with the grade?Technically no because of that area but otherwise a pretty clean blast white luster bomb specimen in person which is what I think gave it a pass for 67.