Or maybe not.. sellers pics being so-so... and no truview at pcgs but will see what happens... I got her for about 70% list so I'm happy but then I also think she's undergraded lol
Reverse is gorgeous, and a solid 65. The obverse has great luster too, but lots of cheek bag marks. 62 for the obverse. So, I will go 63, because of the baggy obverse, based on those so-so pictures.
Hard to say anything definite from the pictures, I think Morgandude is on course from what we can see.
The obverse doesn't look frosty enough to go PL. I might be a 63 in hand. From the Photos I am thinking it is a 62. Remember most of the early S mints came from some very PL and DPL dies.
Yeah I gonna go ahead an post this one early as the pics not great... MS63 OGH and as i said for about 70-75% list I'm Happy
OGH holders had plenty of over graded examples in them even for todays standards. As a holder they are getting harder and harder to come by.
MS 63 was my grade before the reveal based on the same reasoning as @Morgandude11 ....that's a nice reverse and Morgans in rattlers are always cool
This one just caught and held my eye especialy that reverse though the obverse ain't shabby either.. add in the under list price and the OGH and i couldn't resist lol
she has arrived and much cleaner looking then the sellers pic shows (he had a bad angle i think) I am very very very happy with this win I have little doubt if i sent it back in it would come back 64 or better maybe even a PL but not dpl...
