SOMEONE HELP! One of a kind find????

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by ImPeachyOk, Dec 28, 2021.

  1. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Notice the reeding inside the rim...

    upload_2021-12-30_7-34-17.png
     
    Stevearino and ZoidMeister like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. YankeeDime

    YankeeDime non-conformant

    It's interesting. Maybe a partial collar?

    Not sure how it would have got the reeded rim at the mint though. It won't fit in anything that would have gave it reeding... o_O

    Edit: Nevermind, @Fred Weinberg explained it, lol.
     
  4. YankeeDime

    YankeeDime non-conformant

    daniel a DiBiasio and eddiespin like this.
  5. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Clever. :)
     
    YankeeDime likes this.
  6. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    He is correct that it is a partial collar, he was wrong about the reverse die being the hammer die. A partial collar spread out to the wider diameter because the planchet extends up out of the coining chamber and that only happens on the hammer die side. As you can see on your coin the wider diameter is on the obverse die side so the obverse was the hammer die. And I agree the "reeding" is damage most likely from a counting machine
     
    Oldhoopster likes this.
  7. john65999

    john65999 Well-Known Member

    ex-jewelry coin, was mounted, i have one too, thought was an error, but i made an error buying it for 12.00, lol have a great day, happy new years!!
     
    Stevearino likes this.
  8. Jersey magic man

    Jersey magic man Supporter! Supporter

    The nickel is made from some pretty hard material. I find it hard to believe that the jewelry ring could apply enough pressure to make those edge marks.
     
    Cheech9712, Fallguy and Oldhoopster like this.
  9. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    You got the best of the best to help. Welcome to CT. Keep posting the best is yet to come for you!
     
    Mickey in PDX likes this.
  10. Oldhoopster

    Oldhoopster Member of the ANA since 1982

    This is the correct explanation along with Mr. Weinberg's earlier post. If you measure the diameter of the largest diameter, you should find that it's larger than the 21.21 mm (0.835") standard.

    It was not caused by a jewelry mount.
     
    Cheech9712 and Fallguy like this.
  11. john65999

    john65999 Well-Known Member

    yuppers def dam, i had a cent5 with a ridg all around it and fred weinberg and potty set me straight, it sucks not winning sometimes, i feel for ya bro!!
     
  12. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    Yeah. Was thinking same thing.
     
  13. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    Like @Jersey magic man said. I agree with both of you
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page